Suppr超能文献

记忆检测2.0:首个基于网络的记忆检测测试。

Memory detection 2.0: the first web-based memory detection test.

作者信息

Kleinberg Bennett, Verschuere Bruno

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0118715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118715. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence that reaction times (RTs) can be used to detect recognition of critical (e.g., crime) information. A limitation of this research base is its reliance upon small samples (average n = 24), and indications of publication bias. To advance RT-based memory detection, we report upon the development of the first web-based memory detection test. Participants in this research (Study1: n = 255; Study2: n = 262) tried to hide 2 high salient (birthday, country of origin) and 2 low salient (favourite colour, favourite animal) autobiographical details. RTs allowed to detect concealed autobiographical information, and this, as predicted, more successfully so than error rates, and for high salient than for low salient items. While much remains to be learned, memory detection 2.0 seems to offer an interesting new platform to efficiently and validly conduct RT-based memory detection research.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,反应时间(RTs)可用于检测对关键(如犯罪)信息的识别。该研究基础的一个局限性在于其对小样本(平均n = 24)的依赖以及存在发表偏倚的迹象。为了推进基于反应时间的记忆检测,我们报告了首个基于网络的记忆检测测试的开发情况。本研究的参与者(研究1:n = 255;研究2:n = 262)试图隐瞒2个高显著性(生日、原籍国)和2个低显著性(最喜欢的颜色、最喜欢的动物)的自传性细节。反应时间能够检测出被隐瞒的自传性信息,正如预期的那样,与错误率相比,它能更成功地做到这一点,而且对于高显著性项目比低显著性项目更有效。虽然仍有许多有待了解的地方,但记忆检测2.0似乎提供了一个有趣的新平台,可用于高效且有效地开展基于反应时间的记忆检测研究。

相似文献

1
Memory detection 2.0: the first web-based memory detection test.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0118715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118715. eCollection 2015.
2
ID-Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity.
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61 Suppl 1:S237-40. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12960. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
An interfering dot-probe task facilitates the detection of mock crime memory in a reaction time (RT)-based concealed information test.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Feb;142(2):278-85. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
4
Memory detection using fMRI - does the encoding context matter?
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.051. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Retroactive memory interference: a potential countermeasure technique against psychophysiological knowledge detection methods.
Biol Psychol. 2015 Mar;106:68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
7
Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Jun;26(2):266-282. doi: 10.1037/xap0000250. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Variation of picture angles and its effect on the Concealed Information Test.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Jul 31;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00233-6.
9
Novel, ERP-based, concealed information detection: Combining recognition-based and feedback-evoked ERPs.
Biol Psychol. 2016 Feb;114:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Fast & furious: Rejecting the hypothesis that secondary psychopathy improves reaction time-based concealed information detection.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0311948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311948. eCollection 2024.
5
The role of response conflict in concealed information detection with reaction times.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 19;13(1):17856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43779-3.
7
Memory advantage for untrustworthy faces: Replication across lab- and web-based studies.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0264034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264034. eCollection 2022.
8
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time-based concealed information test: the effect of observation time.
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01643-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
The mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test.
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2808-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01432-y. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
Dispersion matters: Diagnostics and control data computer simulation in Concealed Information Test studies.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 2;15(10):e0240259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240259. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923.
2
An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):657-60. doi: 10.1177/1745691612462588.
3
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):543-54. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459060.
4
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
6
Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments.
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Jun;47(2):309-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0471-1.
8
Reaction time measures in deception research: comparing the effects of irrelevant and relevant stimulus-response compatibility.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
9
Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers.
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.
10
When interference helps: increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test.
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 28;4:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验