Tsai Yi-Chen, Lo Yu-Hui, Tseng Philip
School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01784-z.
The Concealed Information Test (CIT), also known as the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), is a method of deception detection by presenting the suspects with familiar stimuli that only the culprits would recognize. Because recognition memory is crucial to the success of reaction time-based CIT, in this study we investigated how pictorial and verbal crime-related items (i.e., Probes) of a visually experienced mock crime would perform against time delay and memory deterioration. Participants visually encoded the details of a theft mock crime from a first-person perspective and were randomly assigned to one of the Probe modalities (i.e., verbal vs. pictorial) group and one of the time delays (immediate vs. 2-week delay) group: immediate verbal, immediate pictorial, 2-week verbal, 2-week pictorial. We observed significant Probe-Irrelevant RT difference in all 4 conditions. When we evaluated the ability of each condition to differentiate between guilty and innocent by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, we observed a significant effect of time delay, with higher AUCs in the immediate condition compared to the 2-week delay, and no difference between verbal and pictorial modalities. Together, our results suggest that for visually experienced events, CIT effects can be observed 1) both with pictorial or verbal Probes, 2) both immediately and after 2 weeks, and 3) importantly, although pictorial and verbal Probes perform equally well, a 2-week delay would cost CIT efficacy in AUC.
隐蔽信息测试(CIT),也被称为有罪知识测试(GKT),是一种通过向嫌疑人呈现只有罪犯才会识别的熟悉刺激来检测欺骗的方法。由于识别记忆对于基于反应时间的CIT的成功至关重要,在本研究中,我们调查了视觉体验过的模拟犯罪的图片和语言类犯罪相关项目(即探测项)在时间延迟和记忆衰退情况下的表现。参与者从第一人称视角对盗窃模拟犯罪的细节进行视觉编码,并被随机分配到探测项形式(即语言类与图片类)组和时间延迟(即时与两周延迟)组中的一组:即时语言组、即时图片组、两周语言组、两周图片组。我们在所有4种条件下均观察到了显著的探测项-无关反应时差异。当我们通过接受者操作特征分析计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估每种条件区分有罪和无罪的能力时,我们观察到了时间延迟的显著影响,即时条件下的AUC高于两周延迟条件,且语言类和图片类形式之间没有差异。总之,我们的结果表明,对于视觉体验过的事件,CIT效应可以在以下情况下观察到:1)使用图片或语言探测项;2)即时和两周后;3)重要的是,尽管图片和语言探测项表现同样良好,但两周的延迟会使CIT在AUC方面的效力降低。