Shah R J, Diamond J M, Cantu E, Flesch J, Lee J C, Lederer D J, Lama V N, Orens J, Weinacker A, Wilkes D S, Roe D, Bhorade S, Wille K M, Ware L B, Palmer S M, Crespo M, Demissie E, Sonnet J, Shah A, Kawut S M, Bellamy S L, Localio A R, Christie J D
Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Transplant. 2015 Aug;15(8):2188-96. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13262. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early mortality after lung transplant. We aimed to define objective estimates of PGD risk based on readily available clinical variables, using a prospective study of 11 centers in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group (LTOG). Derivation included 1255 subjects from 2002 to 2010; with separate validation in 382 subjects accrued from 2011 to 2012. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of grade 3 PGD at 48/72 h, and decision curve methods to assess impact on clinical decisions. 211/1255 subjects in the derivation and 56/382 subjects in the validation developed PGD. We developed three prediction models, where low-risk recipients had a normal BMI (18.5-25 kg/m(2) ), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/cystic fibrosis, and absent or mild pulmonary hypertension (mPAP<40 mmHg). All others were considered higher-risk. Low-risk recipients had a predicted PGD risk of 4-7%, and high-risk a predicted PGD risk of 15-18%. Adding a donor-smoking lung to a higher-risk recipient significantly increased PGD risk, although risk did not change in low-risk recipients. Validation demonstrated that probability estimates were generally accurate and that models worked best at baseline PGD incidences between 5% and 25%. We conclude that valid estimates of PGD risk can be produced using readily available clinical variables.
原发性移植肺功能障碍(PGD)是肺移植术后早期死亡的主要原因。我们旨在基于易于获得的临床变量,对PGD风险进行客观评估,为此开展了一项对肺移植结果研究组(LTOG)11个中心的前瞻性研究。推导纳入了2002年至2010年的1255名受试者;并对2011年至2012年纳入的382名受试者进行了单独验证。我们使用逻辑回归来确定48/72小时时3级PGD的预测因素,并采用决策曲线方法评估对临床决策的影响。推导队列中的211/1255名受试者以及验证队列中的56/382名受试者发生了PGD。我们开发了三种预测模型,低风险受者的BMI正常(18.5 - 25 kg/m²),患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病/囊性纤维化,且无或仅有轻度肺动脉高压(平均肺动脉压<40 mmHg)。其他所有受者均被视为高风险。低风险受者的预测PGD风险为4 - 7%,高风险受者的预测PGD风险为15 - 18%。将供体吸烟肺给予高风险受者会显著增加PGD风险,而低风险受者的风险则无变化。验证表明,概率估计总体准确,且模型在基线PGD发生率为5%至25%时效果最佳。我们得出结论,利用易于获得的临床变量能够对PGD风险做出有效的评估。