Ellis R, Allport D A, Humphreys G W, Collis J
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1989 Nov;41(4):775-96. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402393.
Three experiments are described in which two pictures of isolated man-made objects were presented in succession. The subjects' task was to decide, as rapidly as possible, whether the two pictured objects had the same name. With a stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) of above 200 msec two types of facilitation were observed: (1) the response latency was reduced if the pictures showed the same object, even though seen from different viewpoints (object benefit); (2) decision time was reduced further if the pictures showed the same object from the same angle of view (viewpoint benefit). These facilitation effects were not affected by projecting the pictures to different retinal locations. Significant benefits of both types were also obtained when the projected images differed in size. However, in these circumstances there was a small but significant performance decrement in matching two similar views of a single object, but not if the views were different. Conversely, the object benefit, but not the viewpoint benefit, was reduced when the SOA was only 100 msec. The data suggest the existence of (at least) two different visual codes, one non-retinotopic but viewer-centred, the other object-centred.
本文描述了三个实验,实验中相继呈现两张孤立人造物体的图片。受试者的任务是尽快判断两张图片中的物体是否有相同的名称。当刺激起始异步(SOA)超过200毫秒时,观察到两种类型的促进作用:(1)如果图片展示的是同一物体,即使是从不同视角看到的,反应潜伏期也会缩短(物体益处);(2)如果图片从相同视角展示同一物体,决策时间会进一步缩短(视角益处)。这些促进作用不受将图片投射到不同视网膜位置的影响。当投射图像大小不同时,也获得了两种类型的显著益处。然而,在这些情况下,匹配单个物体的两个相似视图时表现会有轻微但显著的下降,但如果视图不同则不会。相反,当SOA仅为100毫秒时,物体益处会降低,但视角益处不会。数据表明(至少)存在两种不同的视觉编码,一种是非视网膜拓扑的但以观察者为中心,另一种是以物体为中心。