Suppr超能文献

诊断超声测量多裂肌的可靠性。

Reliability of diagnostic ultrasound in measuring the multifidus muscle.

作者信息

Skeie Eirik Johan, Borge Jan Arve, Leboeuf-Yde Charlotte, Bolton Jenni, Wedderkopp Niels

机构信息

MChiro, MSc, Ulriksdal 2, 5009 Bergen, Norway.

DC, MSc, Ulriksdal 2, 5009 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2015 Apr 15;23:15. doi: 10.1186/s12998-015-0059-6. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is frequently used to measure activity in the lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM). However previous reliability studies on diagnostic ultrasound and LMM have included a limited number of subjects and few have used Bland-Altman's Limits of Agreement (LOA). Further one does not know if activity affects the subjects' ability to contract the LMM.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2012 an inter- and intra-examiner reliability study was carried out in a clinical setting. It consisted of a total of four experiments with 30 subjects in each study. Two experienced examiners performed all measurements. Ultrasound measurements were made of: 1. the LMM in the resting state, 2. during a contracted state, 3. on subsequent days, and, before and after walking. Reliability and agreement was tested for 1. resting LMM, 2. contracted LMM, and 3. thickness change in the LMM. Mean values of three measurements were used for statistical analysis for each spinal level. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 3.1 and 3.2 was used to test for reliability, and Bland-Altman's LOA method to test for agreement.

RESULTS

All of the studies indicate high levels of reliability, but as the LMM thickness increased (increasing contraction) the agreement between examiners was poorer than for low levels of contraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of diagnostic ultrasound to measure the LMM seems to be reliable in subjects who have little or no change in thickness of the LMM with contraction.

摘要

背景

超声常用于测量腰多裂肌(LMM)的活动。然而,以往关于诊断超声与LMM的可靠性研究纳入的受试者数量有限,很少有研究采用Bland-Altman一致性界限(LOA)。此外,尚不清楚活动是否会影响受试者收缩LMM的能力。

方法

2012年1月至2012年12月,在临床环境中进行了一项检查者间和检查者内可靠性研究。该研究共包括四项实验,每项研究有30名受试者。两名经验丰富的检查者进行了所有测量。超声测量包括:1. 静息状态下的LMM;2. 收缩状态下的LMM;3. 随后几天以及行走前后的LMM。对1. 静息LMM、2. 收缩LMM和3. LMM厚度变化进行了可靠性和一致性测试。每个脊柱节段采用三次测量的平均值进行统计分析。使用组内相关系数(ICC)3.1和3.2测试可靠性,采用Bland-Altman的LOA方法测试一致性。

结果

所有研究均表明可靠性较高,但随着LMM厚度增加(收缩增强),检查者之间的一致性低于低收缩水平时。

结论

对于LMM厚度在收缩时几乎没有变化或变化不大的受试者,使用诊断超声测量LMM似乎是可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391c/4397671/be5288ac3fa2/12998_2015_59_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验