Kwan Marilyn L, Kroenke Candyce H, Sweeney Carol, Bernard Philip S, Weltzien Erin K, Castillo Adrienne, Factor Rachel E, Maxfield Kaylynn S, Stijleman Inge J, Kushi Lawrence H, Quesenberry Charles P, Habel Laurel A, Caan Bette J
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 14;15:278. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1263-4.
Invasive breast cancers are now commonly classified using gene expression into biologically and clinically distinct tumor subtypes. However, the role of obesity in breast tumor gene expression and intrinsic subtype is unknown.
Early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients (n = 1,676) were sampled from two prospective cohorts. The PAM50 qRT-PCR assay was used to: a) assess tumor gene expression levels for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and 10 proliferation genes and b) classify tumors into intrinsic subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like, HER2-enriched, Normal-like). Body mass index (BMI) around BC diagnosis (kg/m(2)) was categorized as: underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5-24), overweight (25-29), mildly obese (30-34), and highly obese (≥35). In a cross-sectional analysis, we evaluated associations of BMI with gene expression using linear regression models, and associations of BMI with non-Luminal A intrinsic subtypes, compared with Luminal A subtype, using multinomial logistic regression. Statistical significance tests were two-sided.
Highly obese women had tumors with higher expression of proliferation genes compared with normal weight women (adjusted mean difference = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.71), yet mildly obese (adjusted mean difference = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.38) and overweight (adjusted mean difference = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.36) women did not. This association was stronger in postmenopausal women (p for interaction = 0.06). Being highly obese, however, was inversely associated with ESR1 expression (adjusted mean difference = -0.95; 95% CI: -1.47, -0.42) compared with being normal weight, whereas being mildly obese and overweight were not. In addition, women with Basal-like and Luminal B subtypes, relative to those with Luminal A subtype, were more likely to be highly obese, compared with normal-weight.
ER expression may not increase correspondingly with increasing degree of obesity. Highly obese patients are more likely to have tumor subtypes associated with high proliferation and poorer prognosis.
浸润性乳腺癌目前通常根据基因表达分为生物学和临床特征不同的肿瘤亚型。然而,肥胖在乳腺肿瘤基因表达和内在亚型中的作用尚不清楚。
从两个前瞻性队列中选取早期乳腺癌(BC)患者(n = 1676)。采用PAM50 qRT-PCR检测方法:a)评估ESR1、PGR、ERBB2和10个增殖基因的肿瘤基因表达水平;b)将肿瘤分为内在亚型(腔面A型、腔面B型、基底样型、HER2富集型、正常样型)。将BC诊断前后的体重指数(BMI,kg/m²)分为:体重过轻(<18.5)、正常(18.5 - 24)、超重(25 - 29)、轻度肥胖(30 - 34)和高度肥胖(≥35)。在横断面分析中,我们使用线性回归模型评估BMI与基因表达的关联,并使用多项逻辑回归评估BMI与非腔面A型内在亚型(与腔面A型相比)的关联。统计学显著性检验为双侧检验。
与正常体重女性相比,高度肥胖女性的肿瘤增殖基因表达更高(调整后平均差异 = 0.44;95%可信区间:0.18,0.71),而轻度肥胖(调整后平均差异 = 0.16;95%可信区间:-0.06,0.38)和超重(调整后平均差异 = 0.18;95%可信区间:-0.01,0.36)女性则不然。这种关联在绝经后女性中更强(交互作用p = 0.06)。然而,与正常体重相比,高度肥胖与ESR1表达呈负相关(调整后平均差异 = -0.95;95%可信区间:-1.47,-0.42),而轻度肥胖和超重则不然。此外,与正常体重相比,基底样型和腔面B型亚型的女性比腔面A型亚型的女性更有可能高度肥胖。
雌激素受体(ER)表达可能不会随着肥胖程度的增加而相应增加。高度肥胖患者更有可能患有与高增殖和较差预后相关的肿瘤亚型。