Edwards M H, Dennison E M, Aihie Sayer A, Fielding R, Cooper C
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, UK.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, UK; Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Bone. 2015 Nov;80:126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Osteoporosis and sarcopenia are common in older age and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, they are both attended by a considerable socioeconomic burden. Osteoporosis was defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 1994 as a bone mineral density of less than 2.5 standard deviations below the sex-specific young adult mean and this characterisation has been adopted globally. Subsequently, a further step forward was taken when bone mineral density was incorporated into fracture risk prediction algorithms, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) also developed by the WHO. In contrast, for sarcopenia there have been several diagnostic criteria suggested, initially relating to low muscle mass alone and more recently low muscle mass and muscle function. However, none of these have been universally accepted. This has led to difficulties in accurately delineating the burden of disease, exploring geographic differences, and recruiting appropriate subjects to clinical trials. There is also uncertainty about how improvement in sarcopenia should be measured in pharmaceutical trials. Reasons for these difficulties include the number of facets of muscle health available, e.g. mass, strength, function, and performance, and the various clinical outcomes to which sarcopenia can be related such as falls, fracture, disability and premature mortality. It is imperative that a universal definition of sarcopenia is reached soon to facilitate greater progress in research into this debilitating condition. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Muscle Bone Interactions".
骨质疏松症和肌肉减少症在老年人中很常见,且与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。因此,它们都伴随着相当大的社会经济负担。1994年,世界卫生组织(WHO)将骨质疏松症定义为骨矿物质密度低于特定性别年轻成年人平均值2.5个标准差以下,这一定义已在全球采用。随后,当骨矿物质密度被纳入骨折风险预测算法时又向前迈进了一步,比如同样由WHO开发的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)。相比之下,对于肌肉减少症,已经提出了几种诊断标准,最初仅与低肌肉量有关,最近则与低肌肉量和肌肉功能有关。然而,这些标准都未被普遍接受。这导致在准确描述疾病负担、探索地理差异以及招募合适的受试者进行临床试验方面存在困难。在药物试验中,关于如何衡量肌肉减少症的改善情况也存在不确定性。这些困难的原因包括肌肉健康的多个方面,如质量、力量、功能和表现,以及肌肉减少症可能相关的各种临床结果,如跌倒、骨折、残疾和过早死亡。必须尽快达成肌肉减少症的通用定义,以促进对这种使人衰弱病症的研究取得更大进展。本文是名为“肌肉与骨骼相互作用”的特刊的一部分。