Suppr超能文献

推动基于证据的医疗保健的大规模实施:合作探究的内部人士观点

Facilitating large-scale implementation of evidence based health care: insider accounts from a co-operative inquiry.

作者信息

Waterman Heather, Boaden Ruth, Burey Lorraine, Howells Brook, Harvey Gill, Humphreys John, Rothwell Katy, Spence Michael

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth St. West, Manchester, M15 6 PB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 13;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0722-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facilitators are known to be influential in the implementation of evidence-based health care (EBHC). However, little evidence exists on what it is that they do to support the implementation process. This research reports on how knowledge transfer associates (KTAs) working as part of the UK National Institute for Health Research 'Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' for Greater Manchester (GM CLAHRC) facilitated the implementation of EBHC across several commissioning and provider health care agencies.

METHODS

A prospective co-operative inquiry with eight KTAs was carried out comprising of 11 regular group meetings where they reflected critically on their experiences. Twenty interviews were also conducted with other members of the GM CLAHRC Implementation Team to gain their perspectives of the KTAs facilitation role and process.

RESULTS

There were four phases to the facilitation of EBHC on a large scale: (1) Assisting with the decision on what EBHC to implement, in this phase, KTAs pulled together people and disparate strands of information to facilitate a decision on which EBHC should be implemented; (2) Planning of the implementation of EBHC, in which KTAs spent time gathering additional information and going between key people to plan the implementation; (3) Coordinating and implementing EBHC when KTAs recruited general practices and people for the implementation of EBHC; and (4) Evaluating the EBHC which required the KTAs to set up (new) systems to gather data for analysis. Over time, the KTAs demonstrated growing confidence and skills in aspects of facilitation: research, interpersonal communication, project management and change management skills.

CONCLUSION

The findings provide prospective empirical data on the large scale implementation of EBHC in primary care and community based organisations focusing on resources and processes involved. Detailed evidence shows facilitation is context dependent and that 'one size does not fits all'. Co-operative inquiry was a useful method to enhance KTAs learning. The evidence shows that facilitators need tailored support and education, during the process of implementation to provide them with a well-rounded skill-set. Our study was not designed to demonstrate how facilitators contribute to patient health outcomes thus further prospective research is required.

摘要

背景

众所周知,促进者在循证医疗保健(EBHC)的实施过程中具有影响力。然而,关于他们为支持实施过程所做的工作,几乎没有相关证据。本研究报告了作为英国国家卫生研究院大曼彻斯特地区“应用健康研究与护理领导力合作组织”(GM CLAHRC)一部分的知识转移伙伴(KTA)如何在多个委托和提供医疗保健服务的机构中促进循证医疗保健的实施。

方法

对八名知识转移伙伴进行了一项前瞻性合作调查,包括11次定期小组会议,在会议上他们对自己的经历进行了批判性反思。还与GM CLAHRC实施团队的其他成员进行了20次访谈,以了解他们对知识转移伙伴促进作用和过程的看法。

结果

大规模促进循证医疗保健有四个阶段:(1)协助决定实施何种循证医疗保健,在此阶段,知识转移伙伴召集人员并整合不同的信息线索,以促进关于应实施何种循证医疗保健的决策;(2)循证医疗保健实施计划,在此过程中,知识转移伙伴花时间收集更多信息,并在关键人员之间穿梭以规划实施;(3)协调和实施循证医疗保健,此时知识转移伙伴招募全科医生和人员来实施循证医疗保健;(4)评估循证医疗保健,这要求知识转移伙伴建立(新)系统来收集数据进行分析。随着时间的推移,知识转移伙伴在促进的各个方面表现出越来越强的信心和技能:研究、人际沟通、项目管理和变革管理技能。

结论

研究结果提供了关于在初级保健和社区组织中大规模实施循证医疗保健的前瞻性实证数据,重点关注所涉及的资源和过程。详细证据表明,促进工作取决于具体情况,“一刀切”并不适用。合作调查是增强知识转移伙伴学习的有用方法。证据表明,在实施过程中,促进者需要量身定制的支持和教育,以使其具备全面的技能。我们的研究并非旨在证明促进者如何对患者健康结果做出贡献,因此需要进一步的前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90d/4339083/ed4b97fb6c05/12913_2015_722_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验