Suppr超能文献

多探测器计算机断层扫描的剂量测定方法。

Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.

作者信息

Gancheva M, Dyakov I, Vassileva J, Avramova-Cholakova S, Taseva D

机构信息

National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria

National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):190-3. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv187. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare four dosimetry methods for wide-beam multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in terms of computed tomography dose index free in air (CTDI free-in-air) and CTDI measured in phantom (CTDI phantom). The study was performed with Aquilion One 320-detector row CT (Toshiba), Ingenuity 64-detector row CT (Philips) and Aquilion 64 64-detector row CT (Toshiba). In addition to the standard dosimetry, three other dosimetry methods were also applied. The first method, suggested by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for MDCT, includes free-in-air measurements with a standard 100-mm CT pencil ion chamber, stepped through the X-ray beam, along the z-axis, at intervals equal to its sensitive length. Two cases were studied-with an integration length of 200 mm and with a standard polimetil metakrilat (PMMA) dosimetry phantom. The second approach comprised measurements with a twice-longer phantom and two 100-mm chambers positioned and fixed against each other, forming a detection length of 200 mm. As a third method, phantom measurements were performed to study the real-dose profile along z-axis using thermoluminescent detectors. Fabricated PMMA tube of a total length of 300 mm in cylindrical shape containing LiF detectors was used. CTDI free-in-air measured with an integration length of 300 mm for 160 mm wide beam was by 194 % higher than the same quantity measured using the standard method. For an integration length of 200 mm, the difference was 18 % for 40 mm wide beam and 14 % for 32 mm wide beam in comparison with the standard CTDI measurement. For phantom measurements, the IEC method resulted in difference of 41 % for the beam width 160 mm, 19 % for the beam width 40 mm and 18 % for the beam width 32 mm compared with the method for CTDI vol. CTDI values from direct measurement in the phantom central hole with two chambers differ by 20 % from the calculated values by the IEC method. Dose profile for beam widths of 40, 32 and 16 mm, and analysis and conclusions are presented.

摘要

本研究的目的是就空气比释动能自由体模(空气比释动能自由)和模体中测量的剂量长度乘积(模体剂量长度乘积),比较宽束多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)的四种剂量测定方法。该研究使用了Aquilion One 320排CT(东芝)、Ingenuity 64排CT(飞利浦)和Aquilion 64 64排CT(东芝)进行。除了标准剂量测定法外,还应用了其他三种剂量测定方法。第一种方法是国际电工委员会(IEC)针对MDCT建议的方法,包括使用标准的100毫米CT铅笔电离室在空气中进行测量,沿z轴以等于其灵敏长度的间隔穿过X射线束。研究了两种情况——积分长度为200毫米以及使用标准聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)剂量测定模体。第二种方法包括使用两倍长的模体以及两个相互定位并固定的100毫米电离室进行测量,形成200毫米的探测长度。作为第三种方法,使用热释光探测器进行模体测量以研究沿z轴的实际剂量分布。使用了总长度为300毫米的圆柱形制造的PMMA管,其中包含LiF探测器。对于160毫米宽的束,积分长度为300毫米时测量的空气比释动能自由比使用标准方法测量的相同量高194%。对于积分长度为200毫米,与标准剂量长度乘积测量相比,40毫米宽束的差异为18%,32毫米宽束的差异为14%。对于模体测量,与剂量长度乘积方法相比,IEC方法对于160毫米的束宽差异为41%,对于40毫米的束宽差异为19%,对于32毫米的束宽差异为18%。通过两个电离室在模体中心孔中直接测量的剂量长度乘积值与IEC方法计算的值相差20%。给出了40、32和16毫米束宽的剂量分布以及分析和结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验