Fassbinder Till, Saunders Ute, Mickholz Eva, Jung Elisabeth, Becker Heidemarie, Schlüter Bernhard, Jacobi Annett Marita
Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology/ Department of Internal Medicine D, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Center for Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Apr 3;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0603-8.
Disease activity and therapy show an impact on cellular and serological parameters in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study was performed to compare the influence of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) therapy on these parameters in patients with flaring, organ-threatening disease.
SLE patients currently receiving CYC (n = 20), MMF (n = 25) or no immunosuppressive drugs (n = 22) were compared using a cross-sectional design. Median disease activity and daily corticosteroid dose were similar in these treatment groups. Concurrent medication, organ manifestations, and disease activity were recorded, and cellular and serological parameters were determined by routine diagnostic tests or flow cytometric analysis. In addition follow-up data were obtained from different sets of patients (CYC n = 24; MMF n = 23).
Although both drugs showed a significant effect on disease activity and circulating B cell subsets, only MMF reduced circulating plasmablasts and plasma cells as well as circulating free light chains within three months of induction therapy. Neither MMF nor CYC were able to reduce circulating memory B cells. MMF lowered IgA levels more markedly than CYC. We did not observe a significant difference in the reduction of IgG levels or anti-dsDNA antibodies comparing patients receiving MMF or CYC. In contrast to MMF, induction therapy with CYC was associated with a significant increase of circulating CD8+ effector T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) after three months.
The results indicate differences between MMF and CYC with regard to the mechanism of action. MMF, but not CYC, treatment leads to a fast and enduring reduction of surrogate markers of B cell activation, such as circulating plasmablasts, plasma cells and free light chains but a comparable rate of hypogammaglobulinemia.
疾病活动度和治疗对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的细胞和血清学参数有影响。本研究旨在比较霉酚酸酯(MMF)和环磷酰胺(CYC)治疗对病情复发、有器官受累风险的患者这些参数的影响。
采用横断面设计,比较目前正在接受CYC治疗(n = 20)、MMF治疗(n = 25)或未接受免疫抑制药物治疗(n = 22)的SLE患者。这些治疗组的疾病活动度中位数和每日皮质类固醇剂量相似。记录同时使用的药物、器官表现和疾病活动度,并通过常规诊断测试或流式细胞术分析确定细胞和血清学参数。此外,还从不同组患者中获取随访数据(CYC组n = 24;MMF组n = 23)。
尽管两种药物对疾病活动度和循环B细胞亚群均有显著影响,但只有MMF在诱导治疗的三个月内降低了循环浆母细胞、浆细胞以及循环游离轻链。MMF和CYC均无法降低循环记忆B细胞。MMF比CYC更显著地降低IgA水平。在比较接受MMF或CYC治疗的患者时,我们未观察到IgG水平或抗双链DNA抗体降低方面的显著差异。与MMF相反,CYC诱导治疗三个月后循环CD8 + 效应T细胞和浆细胞样树突状细胞(pDC)显著增加。
结果表明MMF和CYC在作用机制方面存在差异。MMF治疗而非CYC治疗可快速且持久地降低B细胞活化的替代标志物,如循环浆母细胞、浆细胞和游离轻链,但低丙种球蛋白血症的发生率相当。