Suppr超能文献

决策与循证实践的应用:三条腿的凳子平衡了吗?

Decision making and the use of evidence based practice: Is the three-legged stool balanced?

作者信息

Stewart Rebecca E, Chambless Dianne L, Stirman Shannon Wiltsey

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

National Center for PTSD and Stanford University.

出版信息

Pract Innov (Wash D C). 2018 Mar;3(1):56-67. doi: 10.1037/pri0000063.

Abstract

This article presents the results of a qualitative analysis of interviews with 25 psychologists in independent practice, with a focus on decision making with a selected patient. We endeavored to examine how clinical decision making intersected with the principles of evidence based practice (EBP) as laid out by Spring (2007). Clinicians reported that diagnostic impressions were generally formulated through unstructured assessment rather than validated instruments, and that treatment selection was based on therapists' perceptions of a treatment's match with client characteristics. Therapists viewed CBTs as appropriate for addressing symptoms but believed they needed to depart from CBT strategies to address underlying issues. Nonetheless, they often defined successes and failures in treatment in terms of symptoms. Overall, clinicians rarely mentioned utilization of research evidence for assessment or treatment selection and practice. Results are discussed within the framework of EBP.

摘要

本文呈现了对25位独立执业心理学家访谈的定性分析结果,重点是与一位特定患者的决策过程。我们致力于研究临床决策如何与斯普林(2007年)提出的循证实践(EBP)原则相交。临床医生报告称,诊断印象通常是通过非结构化评估而非经过验证的工具形成的,治疗选择基于治疗师对治疗与患者特征匹配度的认知。治疗师认为认知行为疗法(CBTs)适用于解决症状,但认为需要偏离CBT策略来解决潜在问题。尽管如此,他们通常根据症状来定义治疗的成功与失败。总体而言,临床医生很少提及在评估、治疗选择和实践中使用研究证据。结果将在循证实践的框架内进行讨论。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验