Wu Qiong, Xie Yu
Institute for Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Department of Sociology, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Chin Sociol Rev. 2014;47(1):84-102. doi: 10.2753/CSA2162-0555470104.2014.11082911.
Using data from the nationally representative China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we describe Chinese adults' attitudes towards three specific aspects of social environments: local government performance, severity of major social issues, and social trust. We further explore how county level contextual factors and personal experiences relate to subjective social environments, while controlling for individual demographics. On average, Chinese adults in the CFPS endorsed moderately positive ratings for their local governments, but perceived high severities in various social issues, ranking economic inequality as the most severe. A moderate level of generalized trust (54%) was found, together with very high trust in parents and very low trust in Americans and strangers. Further analyses revealed that variations in subjective social environments at the prefectural level were relatively small compared with individual level variations. At the individual level, personal experiences such as perceived unfair treatment showed consistently negative effects on how people evaluated their social environments. At the contextual level, employment rates appeared more influential than other studied factors. Regional economic inequality, as indicated by prefectural Gini, was not associated with most studied outcomes.
利用具有全国代表性的中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的数据,我们描述了中国成年人对社会环境三个特定方面的态度:地方政府绩效、重大社会问题的严重性以及社会信任。我们进一步探讨了县级背景因素和个人经历如何与主观社会环境相关,同时控制个体人口统计学因素。平均而言,CFPS中的中国成年人对其当地政府的评价为中等偏积极,但认为各种社会问题的严重性较高,将经济不平等列为最严重的问题。发现了中等水平的普遍信任(54%),同时对父母的信任非常高,对美国人和陌生人的信任非常低。进一步分析表明,与个体层面的差异相比,地级层面主观社会环境的差异相对较小。在个体层面,诸如感知到的不公平待遇等个人经历对人们如何评价其社会环境始终产生负面影响。在背景层面,就业率似乎比其他研究因素更具影响力。地级基尼系数所表明的地区经济不平等与大多数研究结果无关。