Suppr超能文献

中国国内移民的社会收入不平等、社会融合和健康状况。

The social income inequality, social integration and health status of internal migrants in China.

机构信息

Faculty of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To examine the interaction between social income inequality, social integration, and health status among internal migrants (IMs) who migrate between regions in China.

METHODS

We used the data from the 2014 Internal Migrant Dynamic Monitoring Survey in China, which sampled 15,999 IMs in eight cities in China. The Gini coefficient at the city level was calculated to measure social income inequality and was categorized into low (0.2 < Gini <= 0.3), medium (0.3 < Gini <= 0.4), high (0.4 < x < = 0.5), and very high (Gini >0.5). Health status was measured based upon self-reported health, subjective well-being, and perceptions of stress and mental health. Social integration was measured from four perspectives (acculturation and integration willingness, social insurance, economy, social communication). Linear mixed models were used to examine the interaction effects between health statuses, social integration, and the Gini coefficient.

RESULTS

Factors of social integration, such as economic integration and acculturation and integration willingness, were significantly related to health. Social income inequality had a negative relationship with the health status of IMs. For example, IMs in one city, Qingdao, with a medium income inequality level (Gini = 0.329), had the best health statuses and better social integration. On the other hand, IMs in another city, Shenzhen, who had a large income inequality (Gini = 0.447) were worst in health statues and had worse social integration.

CONCLUSION

Policies or programs targeting IMs should support integration willingness, promote a sense of belonging, and improve economic equality. In the meantime, social activities to facilitate employment and create social trust should also be promoted. At the societal level, structural and policy changes are necessary to promote income equity to promote IMs' general health status.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在考察中国国内流动人口(IMs)在地区间迁移过程中社会收入不平等、社会融合与健康状况之间的相互作用。

方法

我们使用了 2014 年中国国内流动人口动态监测调查的数据,该调查在中国八个城市抽取了 15999 名 IMs 作为样本。采用城市层面的基尼系数来衡量社会收入不平等程度,并将其分为低(0.2<基尼系数<=0.3)、中(0.3<基尼系数<=0.4)、高(0.4<基尼系数<=0.5)和极高(基尼系数>0.5)四个等级。健康状况基于自我报告的健康状况、主观幸福感以及对压力和心理健康的感知进行衡量。社会融合从四个方面进行衡量(同化和融合意愿、社会保险、经济、社会交流)。采用线性混合模型检验健康状况、社会融合与基尼系数之间的交互效应。

结果

社会融合因素,如经济融合和同化与融合意愿,与健康状况显著相关。社会收入不平等与 IMs 的健康状况呈负相关。例如,处于中等收入不平等水平(基尼系数=0.329)的青岛 IMs 具有最佳的健康状况和更好的社会融合度。另一方面,处于高收入不平等水平(基尼系数=0.447)的深圳 IMs 的健康状况最差,社会融合度也最差。

结论

针对 IMs 的政策或方案应支持同化意愿、促进归属感,并改善经济平等。同时,应促进促进就业和建立社会信任的社会活动。在社会层面上,需要进行结构性和政策变革,以促进收入公平,提高 IMs 的整体健康状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd1/5545016/1a41968eff8f/12939_2017_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验