Ellison William D, Rosenstein Lia, Chelminski Iwona, Dalrymple Kristy, Zimmerman Mark
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Pers Disord. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-70. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_193. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Although dimensional models of borderline personality disorder (BPD) are consistent with findings showing that minimal levels of pathology are associated with substantial increases in psychosocial impairment, it is still unclear whether different individual BPD criteria are each clinically significant on their own. The current study uses semistructured interview data from 1,870 adults presenting for outpatient psychiatric treatment to investigate whether the BPD criteria of impulsivity, affective instability, emptiness, and anger are each related to psychosocial morbidity when met in the absence of the other eight criteria. Analyses showed that each of these criteria was associated with dysfunction in comparison with a control group meeting zero BPD criteria, but only the emptiness criterion was a marker of impairment on all indices of psychosocial morbidity: suicidality, history of suicide attempts and psychiatric hospitalizations, social and work dysfunction, Axis I comorbidity, and global functioning. Implications for the study of borderline pathology are discussed.
尽管边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的维度模型与研究结果一致,这些结果表明最低程度的病理状态与心理社会功能损害的大幅增加相关,但目前仍不清楚不同的个体BPD标准本身是否都具有临床意义。本研究使用了1870名寻求门诊精神科治疗的成年人的半结构化访谈数据,以调查冲动性、情感不稳定、空虚感和愤怒等BPD标准在未满足其他八项标准时是否各自与心理社会发病率相关。分析表明,与符合零项BPD标准的对照组相比,这些标准中的每一项都与功能障碍相关,但只有空虚感标准是心理社会发病率所有指标(自杀倾向、自杀未遂史和精神病住院史、社会和工作功能障碍、轴I共病以及整体功能)损害的标志。文中讨论了对边缘型病理研究的启示。