• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍的抑郁症状学:网络分析。

Understanding of Depressive Symptomatology across Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder: A Network Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 24;60(1):32. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010032.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60010032
PMID:38256293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818784/
Abstract

Depressive symptoms are prominent in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). However, comparative research on the network structure of depressive symptoms in these two diagnostic groups has been limited. This study aims to compare the network structure of depressive symptoms in MDD and BD, providing a deeper understanding of the depressive symptomatology of each disorder. The Zung Self-Rating Depressive Scale, a 20-item questionnaire, was administered to assess the depressive symptoms in individuals with MDD ( = 322) and BD ( = 516). A network analysis was conducted using exploratory graph analysis (EGA), and the network structure was analyzed using regularized partial correlation models. To validate the dimensionality of the Zung SDS, principal component analysis (PCA) was adopted. Centrality measures of the depressive symptoms within each group were assessed, followed by a network comparison test between the two groups. In both diagnostic groups, the network analysis revealed four distinct categories, aligning closely with the PCA results. "Depressed affect" emerged as the most central symptom in both MDD and BD. Furthermore, non-core symptoms, "Personal devaluation" in MDD and "Confusion" in BD, displayed strong centrality. The network comparison test did not reveal significant differences in the network structure between MDD and BD. The absence of significant differences in the network structures between MDD and BD suggests that the underlying mechanisms of depressive symptoms may be similar across these disorders. The identified central symptoms, including "Depressed affect", in both disorders and the distinct non-core symptoms in each highlight the complexity of the depressive symptomatology. Future research should focus on validating these symptoms as therapeutic targets and incorporate various methodologies, including non-metric dimension reduction techniques or canonical analysis.

摘要

抑郁症状在重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BD)中都很明显。然而,关于这两种诊断组别的抑郁症状网络结构的比较研究还很有限。本研究旨在比较 MDD 和 BD 中抑郁症状的网络结构,深入了解每种疾病的抑郁症状。

采用zung 自评抑郁量表(Zung Self-Rating Depressive Scale)对 MDD(n=322)和 BD(n=516)患者的抑郁症状进行评估。采用探索性图形分析(EGA)进行网络分析,并采用正则化偏相关模型分析网络结构。采用主成分分析(PCA)验证 Zung SDS 的维度。评估每个组内抑郁症状的中心性度量,然后对两组之间的网络进行比较测试。

在两个诊断组中,网络分析都揭示了四个不同的类别,与 PCA 结果非常吻合。“抑郁情绪”是 MDD 和 BD 中最中心的症状。此外,非核心症状“个人贬低”在 MDD 和“困惑”在 BD 中表现出很强的中心性。网络比较测试未发现 MDD 和 BD 之间网络结构的显著差异。

MDD 和 BD 之间网络结构没有显著差异表明,这些疾病中抑郁症状的潜在机制可能相似。在这两种疾病中,确定的核心症状,包括“抑郁情绪”,以及每种疾病中独特的非核心症状,突出了抑郁症状的复杂性。未来的研究应该集中验证这些症状作为治疗靶点,并采用各种方法,包括非度量维度减少技术或规范分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b0/10818784/48ac348f549c/medicina-60-00032-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b0/10818784/548a64ae415d/medicina-60-00032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b0/10818784/48ac348f549c/medicina-60-00032-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b0/10818784/548a64ae415d/medicina-60-00032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b0/10818784/48ac348f549c/medicina-60-00032-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding of Depressive Symptomatology across Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder: A Network Analysis.理解重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍的抑郁症状学:网络分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 24;60(1):32. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010032.
2
Symptom networks in acute depression across bipolar and major depressive disorders: A network analysis on a large, international, observational study.双相和单相抑郁障碍急性抑郁中的症状网络:一项大型国际观察性研究的网络分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;35:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Prevalence and factors associated with fatigue in patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder.重性抑郁障碍或双相障碍患者疲劳的患病率及其相关因素。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 1;362:493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
4
Predictors of functional outcome in patients with major depression and bipolar disorder: A dynamic network approach to identify distinct patterns of interacting symptoms.预测重性抑郁障碍和双相障碍患者的功能结局:一种动态网络方法,以识别相互作用症状的不同模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0276822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276822. eCollection 2023.
5
Affect Regulation-Related Emergent Brain Network Properties Differentiate Depressed Bipolar Disorder From Major Depression and Track Risk for Bipolar Disorder.情绪调节相关涌现脑网络特性可区分抑郁双相障碍与重性抑郁障碍,并可预测双相障碍风险。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Aug;7(8):765-773. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
Resting-state functional connectivity graph-properties correlate with bipolar disorder-risk in young medication-free depressed subjects: Bipolar-risk Resting State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression.静息态功能连接图属性与未用药抑郁年轻患者的双相障碍风险相关:重性抑郁中的双相风险静息态功能连接。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 15;301:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.033. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
7
The prevalence and illness characteristics of DSM-5-defined "mixed feature specifier" in adults with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: Results from the International Mood Disorders Collaborative Project.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版定义的“混合特征说明符”在重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍成人患者中的患病率及疾病特征:国际心境障碍协作项目的结果
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
9
A psychometric evaluation of the clinician-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) in patients with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者中临床医生评定的抑郁症状快速量表(QIDS-C16)的心理测量学评估。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Jun;18(2):138-46. doi: 10.1002/mpr.285.
10
Mood spectrum symptoms during a major depressive episode: Differences between 145 patients with bipolar disorder and 155 patients with major depressive disorder. Arguments for a dimensional approach.重性抑郁发作时的心境谱症状:双相障碍 145 例与重性抑郁障碍 155 例患者的差异。对维度方法的论证。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jun;22(4):385-391. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12855. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.比较网络结构的三个方面:置换检验。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Networks of major depressive disorder: A systematic review.重度抑郁症的网络:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Apr;85:102000. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102000. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Can network analysis of self-reported psychopathology shed light on the core phenomenology of bipolar disorders in adolescents and young adults?自我报告的精神病理学的网络分析能否揭示青少年和年轻成人双相情感障碍的核心现象学?
Bipolar Disord. 2021 Sep;23(6):584-594. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13067. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Sex differences in depressive symptoms and their networks in a treatment-seeking population - a cross-sectional study.在治疗人群中,抑郁症状的性别差异及其网络——一项横断面研究。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.074. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Measuring the shadows: A systematic review of chronic emptiness in borderline personality disorder.测量阴影:边缘型人格障碍慢性空洞感的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0233970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233970. eCollection 2020.
6
Symptom networks in acute depression across bipolar and major depressive disorders: A network analysis on a large, international, observational study.双相和单相抑郁障碍急性抑郁中的症状网络:一项大型国际观察性研究的网络分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;35:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial.探索性图分析和传统技术识别潜在因素数量的性能研究:模拟与教程。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):292-320. doi: 10.1037/met0000255. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
The Study of Psychopathology from the Network Analysis Perspective: A Systematic Review.从网络分析角度研究精神病理学:系统评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(2):71-83. doi: 10.1159/000497425. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
A 1-year follow-up study of capacity to love and work: What components of borderline personality disorder most impair interpersonal and vocational functioning?爱与工作能力的 1 年随访研究:边缘型人格障碍的哪些成分对人际和职业功能的损害最大?
Personal Ment Health. 2018 Nov;12(4):334-344. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1432. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data.横截面和时间序列数据中的高斯图模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Jul-Aug;53(4):453-480. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823. Epub 2018 Apr 16.