Schuster Melanie, Eskola Juhani, Duclos Philippe
World Health Organization, Switzerland.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
Despite a wide array of safe and effective vaccines in use globally, with major impacts on health worldwide, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization has been repeatedly confronted with reports of hesitancy towards accepting specific vaccines or vaccination programmes. This paper summarizes the rationale for a SAGE review of the issue of vaccine hesitancy, its impact and ways to address it, and the convening of a Vaccine Hesitancy Working Group in March 2012 to prepare for the SAGE review. It describes the methods used and mode of operations, and advances in the relatively new field of research on vaccine hesitancy. It further elaborates and references the work conducted, including a series of products, conclusions and recommendations that emerged from the SAGE review in October 2014.
尽管全球范围内使用着各种各样安全有效的疫苗，且对全球健康产生了重大影响，但世界卫生组织免疫战略咨询专家组（SAGE）却屡屡收到对接受特定疫苗或疫苗接种计划存在犹豫态度的报告。本文总结了SAGE对疫苗犹豫问题进行审查的理由、其影响及应对方法，以及2012年3月召开疫苗犹豫问题工作组会议为SAGE审查做准备的情况。它描述了所使用的方法和运作模式，以及疫苗犹豫这一相对较新的研究领域的进展。它进一步阐述并引用了所开展的工作，包括2014年10月SAGE审查得出的一系列成果、结论和建议。
