Olsson Martina Barnevik, Westerlund Joakim, Lundström Sebastian, Giacobini MaiBritt, Fernell Elisabeth, Gillberg Christopher
Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden ; PRIMA Child and Adult Psychiatry, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden ; Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Apr 7;11:999-1005. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S78707. eCollection 2015.
The aim of this study was to follow up the 17 children, from a total group of 208 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), who "recovered from autism". They had been clinically diagnosed with ASD at or under the age of 4 years. For 2 years thereafter they received intervention based on applied behavior analysis. These 17 children were all of average or borderline intellectual functioning. On the 2-year follow-up assessment, they no longer met criteria for ASD.
At about 10 years of age they were targeted for a new follow-up. Parents were given a semistructured interview regarding the child's daily functioning, school situation, and need of support, and were interviewed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) and the Autism - Tics, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD), and other Comorbidities (A-TAC) telephone interview.
The vast majority of the children had moderate-to-severe problems with attention/activity regulation, speech and language, behavior, and/or social interaction. A majority of the children had declined in their VABS scores. Most of the 14 children whose parents were A-TAC-interviewed had problems within many behavioral A-TAC domains, and four (29%) had symptom levels corresponding to a clinical diagnosis of ASD, AD/HD, or both. Another seven children (50%) had pronounced subthreshold indicators of ASD, AD/HD, or both.
Children diagnosed at 2-4 years of age as suffering from ASD and who, after appropriate intervention for 2 years, no longer met diagnostic criteria for the disorder, clearly needed to be followed up longer. About 3-4 years later, they still had major problems diagnosable under the umbrella term of ESSENCE (Early Symptomatic Syndromes Eliciting Neurodevelopmental Clinical Examinations). They continued to be in need of support, educationally, from a neurodevelopmental and a medical point of view. According to parent interview data, a substantial minority of these children again met diagnostic criteria for ASD.
本研究旨在对208名自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童中的17名“从自闭症中康复”的儿童进行随访。他们在4岁及4岁以下时被临床诊断为ASD。此后的两年里,他们接受了基于应用行为分析的干预。这17名儿童的智力功能均处于平均水平或临界水平。在2年的随访评估中,他们不再符合ASD的标准。
在他们大约10岁时进行了新一轮随访。对家长进行了关于孩子日常功能、学校情况和支持需求的半结构化访谈,并使用文兰适应行为量表(VABS)以及自闭症-抽动、注意力缺陷多动障碍(AD/HD)及其他共病(A-TAC)电话访谈进行询问。
绝大多数儿童在注意力/活动调节、言语和语言、行为及/或社交互动方面存在中度至重度问题。大多数儿童的VABS得分有所下降。在接受A-TAC访谈的14名儿童中,大多数在多个行为A-TAC领域存在问题,4名(29%)儿童的症状水平符合ASD、AD/HD或两者的临床诊断标准。另外7名儿童(50%)有明显的ASD、AD/HD或两者的阈下指标。
2至4岁时被诊断为患有ASD且经过2年适当干预后不再符合该疾病诊断标准的儿童,显然需要更长时间的随访。大约三到四年后,他们在“ESSENCE”(引发神经发育临床检查的早期症状综合征)这一统称下仍存在可诊断的重大问题。从神经发育和医学角度来看,他们在教育方面仍需要支持。根据家长访谈数据,这些儿童中有相当一部分再次符合ASD的诊断标准。