Suppr超能文献

Onclarity人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测法与杂交捕获II HPV DNA检测法在检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级和3级病变中的比较

Comparison of Onclarity Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Assay with Hybrid Capture II HPV DNA Assay for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and 3 Lesions.

作者信息

Bottari F, Sideri M, Gulmini C, Igidbashian S, Tricca A, Casadio C, Carinelli S, Boveri S, Ejegod D, Bonde J, Sandri M T

机构信息

Division of Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Preventive Gynecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00246-15. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

Abstract

Analytical and clinical performance validation is essential before introduction of a new human papillomavirus (HPV) assay into clinical practice. This study compares the new BD Onclarity HPV assay, which detects E6/E7 DNA from 14 high-risk HPV types, to the Hybrid Capture II (HC2) HPV DNA test, to concurrent cytology and histology results, in order to evaluate its performance in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. A population of 567 women, including 325 with ≥ASCUS (where ASCUS stands for atypical cells of undetermined significance) and any HC2 result and 242 with both negative cytology and negative HC2 results, were prospectively enrolled for the study. The overall agreement between Onclarity and HC2 was 94.6% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 92.3% to 96.2%). In this population with a high prevalence of disease, the relative sensitivities (versus adjudicated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 [CIN2+] histology endpoints) of the Onclarity and HC2 tests were 95.2% (95% CI, 90.7% to 97.5%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 92.9% to 98.7%), respectively, and the relative specificities were 50.3% (95% CI, 43.2% to 57.4%) for BD and 40.8% (95% CI, 33.9%, 48.1%) for HC2. These results indicate that the BD Onclarity HPV assay has sensitivity comparable to that of the HC2 assay, with a trend to an increased specificity. Moreover, as Onclarity gives the chance to discriminate between the different genotypes, we calculated the genotype prevalence and the absolute risk of CIN2+: HPV 16 was the most prevalent genotype (19.8%) with an absolute risk of CIN2+ of 77.1%.

摘要

在将新的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测方法引入临床实践之前,进行分析和临床性能验证至关重要。本研究将可检测14种高危HPV类型E6/E7 DNA的新型BD Onclarity HPV检测方法与杂交捕获二代(HC2)HPV DNA检测方法进行比较,并与同期的细胞学和组织学结果进行对比,以评估其在检测高级别宫颈病变方面的性能。前瞻性纳入了567名女性,其中包括325名具有≥非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASCUS)且HC2检测有任何结果的女性,以及242名细胞学和HC2检测结果均为阴性的女性。Onclarity与HC2之间的总体一致性为94.6%(95%置信区间[CI],92.3%至96.2%)。在该疾病高患病率人群中,Onclarity和HC2检测的相对敏感性(相对于经判定的宫颈上皮内瘤变2级和3级[CIN2+]组织学终点)分别为95.2%(95%CI,90.7%至97.5%)和96.9%(95%CI,92.9%至98.7%),BD的相对特异性为50.3%(95%CI,43.2%至57.4%),HC2的相对特异性为40.8%(95%CI,33.9%,48.1%)。这些结果表明,BD Onclarity HPV检测方法的敏感性与HC2检测方法相当,且有特异性增加的趋势。此外,由于Onclarity能够区分不同的基因型,我们计算了基因型患病率和CIN2+的绝对风险:HPV 16是最常见的基因型(19.8%),CIN2+的绝对风险为77.1%。

相似文献

5
Comparison of Aptima and hybrid capture-2 HPV tests and Pap test in the referral population in Japan.
J Med Virol. 2021 Aug;93(8):5076-5083. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26865. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
Clinical and Analytical Performance of the Onclarity HPV Assay Using the VALGENT Framework.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct;53(10):3272-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01366-15. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of BD Onclarity HPV assay on FLOQSwabs vaginal self-samples.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Mar 5;12(3):e0287223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02872-23. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
2
Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Jan;24(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000494.
3
Bayesian analysis of baseline risk of CIN2 and ≥CIN3 by HPV genotype in a European referral cohort.
Int J Cancer. 2019 Aug 15;145(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32291. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Validation of a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Cervical Screening Test That Provides Expanded HPV Typing.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Apr 25;56(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01910-17. Print 2018 May.
7
HPV-Testing in Follow-up of Patients Treated for CIN2+ Lesions.
J Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;7(1):107-14. doi: 10.7150/jca.13503. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical cancer screening at crossroads.
APMIS. 2014 Aug;122(8):667-73. doi: 10.1111/apm.12279.
4
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials.
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7. Epub 2013 Nov 3.
5
Cervical cancer screening: which HPV test should be used--L1 or E6/E7?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):45-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 5;108(4):908-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.22. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
7
Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010 Oct;8(10):1139-62. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.104.
9
Methods for HPV detection in exfoliated cell and tissue specimens.
APMIS. 2010 Jun;118(6-7):520-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02621.x.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验