Bottari F, Sideri M, Gulmini C, Igidbashian S, Tricca A, Casadio C, Carinelli S, Boveri S, Ejegod D, Bonde J, Sandri M T
Division of Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
Preventive Gynecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00246-15. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Analytical and clinical performance validation is essential before introduction of a new human papillomavirus (HPV) assay into clinical practice. This study compares the new BD Onclarity HPV assay, which detects E6/E7 DNA from 14 high-risk HPV types, to the Hybrid Capture II (HC2) HPV DNA test, to concurrent cytology and histology results, in order to evaluate its performance in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. A population of 567 women, including 325 with ≥ASCUS (where ASCUS stands for atypical cells of undetermined significance) and any HC2 result and 242 with both negative cytology and negative HC2 results, were prospectively enrolled for the study. The overall agreement between Onclarity and HC2 was 94.6% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 92.3% to 96.2%). In this population with a high prevalence of disease, the relative sensitivities (versus adjudicated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 [CIN2+] histology endpoints) of the Onclarity and HC2 tests were 95.2% (95% CI, 90.7% to 97.5%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 92.9% to 98.7%), respectively, and the relative specificities were 50.3% (95% CI, 43.2% to 57.4%) for BD and 40.8% (95% CI, 33.9%, 48.1%) for HC2. These results indicate that the BD Onclarity HPV assay has sensitivity comparable to that of the HC2 assay, with a trend to an increased specificity. Moreover, as Onclarity gives the chance to discriminate between the different genotypes, we calculated the genotype prevalence and the absolute risk of CIN2+: HPV 16 was the most prevalent genotype (19.8%) with an absolute risk of CIN2+ of 77.1%.
在将新的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测方法引入临床实践之前,进行分析和临床性能验证至关重要。本研究将可检测14种高危HPV类型E6/E7 DNA的新型BD Onclarity HPV检测方法与杂交捕获二代(HC2)HPV DNA检测方法进行比较,并与同期的细胞学和组织学结果进行对比,以评估其在检测高级别宫颈病变方面的性能。前瞻性纳入了567名女性,其中包括325名具有≥非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASCUS)且HC2检测有任何结果的女性,以及242名细胞学和HC2检测结果均为阴性的女性。Onclarity与HC2之间的总体一致性为94.6%(95%置信区间[CI],92.3%至96.2%)。在该疾病高患病率人群中,Onclarity和HC2检测的相对敏感性(相对于经判定的宫颈上皮内瘤变2级和3级[CIN2+]组织学终点)分别为95.2%(95%CI,90.7%至97.5%)和96.9%(95%CI,92.9%至98.7%),BD的相对特异性为50.3%(95%CI,43.2%至57.4%),HC2的相对特异性为40.8%(95%CI,33.9%,48.1%)。这些结果表明,BD Onclarity HPV检测方法的敏感性与HC2检测方法相当,且有特异性增加的趋势。此外,由于Onclarity能够区分不同的基因型,我们计算了基因型患病率和CIN2+的绝对风险:HPV 16是最常见的基因型(19.8%),CIN2+的绝对风险为77.1%。