Christensen Morten J, Eller Esben, Mortz Charlotte G, Bindslev-Jensen Carsten
Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense C, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Clin Transl Allergy. 2014 Nov 21;4:39. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-4-39. eCollection 2014.
Allergy to wheat can present clinically in different forms: Sensitization to ingested wheat via the gastrointestinal tract can cause traditional food allergy or in combination with exercise, Wheat-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis (WDEIA). Sensitization to inhaled wheat flour may lead to occupational rhinitis and/or asthma.
We retrospectively reviewed the case notes of 156 patients (age 0.7 - 73.3 years) with a case history of wheat allergy. The population was divided into three groups, 1: Wheat allergy elicited by ingestion, 2: By inhalation and 3: WDEIA. All patients were examined with detailed case history, specific IgE (sIgE), Skin Prick Test (SPT) and wheat challenge (nasal or oral ± exercise). Details of the case history were extracted from the patients´ case records.
Group 1: Twenty one of 95 patients were challenge positive (15 children, 6 adults). All children had atopic dermatitis, and most (13/15) outgrew their wheat allergy. Most children (13/15) had other food allergies. Challenge positive patients showed significantly higher levels of sIgE to wheat and significantly more were SPT positive than challenge negative. Group 2: Eleven out of 13 adults with occupational asthma or rhinitis were challenge positive. None outgrew their allergy. Seven had positive sIgE and 10 had positive SPT to wheat. Group 3: Ten of 48 (adolescent/adults) were positive when challenged during exercise. Challenge positive patients showed significantly higher levels of sIgE to ω-5-gliadin. The natural course is presently unknown.
Wheat allergy can manifest in different disease entities, rendering a detailed case history and challenge mandatory. Patient age, occupation, concomitant allergies (food or inhalant) and atopic dermatitis are important factors for evaluation.
小麦过敏在临床上可表现为不同形式:经胃肠道摄入小麦而致敏可导致传统食物过敏,或与运动相结合引发小麦依赖运动诱发的过敏反应(WDEIA)。吸入小麦粉致敏可能导致职业性鼻炎和/或哮喘。
我们回顾性分析了156例有小麦过敏病史患者(年龄0.7 - 73.3岁)的病历。将人群分为三组:1:因摄入引起的小麦过敏;2:因吸入引起的小麦过敏;3:WDEIA。所有患者均接受详细病史询问、特异性IgE(sIgE)检测、皮肤点刺试验(SPT)以及小麦激发试验(鼻内或口服±运动)。病史细节从患者病历中提取。
第1组:95例患者中有21例激发试验阳性(15名儿童,6名成人)。所有儿童均患有特应性皮炎,且大多数(13/15)长大后不再对小麦过敏。大多数儿童(13/15)还对其他食物过敏。激发试验阳性患者的小麦sIgE水平显著更高,且SPT阳性者明显多于激发试验阴性者。第2组:13例患有职业性哮喘或鼻炎的成人中有11例激发试验阳性。无人长大后不再过敏。7例小麦sIgE阳性,10例小麦SPT阳性。第3组:48例(青少年/成人)中有10例在运动激发试验时呈阳性。激发试验阳性患者的ω-5-麦醇溶蛋白sIgE水平显著更高。其自然病程目前尚不清楚。
小麦过敏可表现为不同的疾病形式,因此详细的病史询问和激发试验必不可少。患者年龄、职业、伴随的过敏(食物或吸入性)以及特应性皮炎是评估的重要因素。