Zhou Jiaxin, Xu Dong, Hou Yong, Wang Qian, Li Mengtao, Zeng Xiaofeng
Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100032, China.
Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100032, China. Email:
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;54(2):125-9.
To analyze the clinical features, laboratory tests, treatments and outcome of patients with scleroderma renal crisis (SRC).
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and laboratory data of 16 patients with scleroderma renal crisis in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2004 to May 2013. The treatment and outcome of SRC patients were also retrospectively analyzed.
There were a total of 16 SRC patients including 5 male patients and 11 females. The median age at SRC onset was (49.9 ± 12.3) years. It usually took 3.2 years from the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) to SRC attack. Ten SRC patients belonged to diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), and 6 patients were limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). Among SRC patients, 16/16 were negative of anti-centromere antibodies (ACAs). All these 16 patients had hypertension and renal insufficiency, including 8 dialysis dependent after the onset of SRC and 7 with thrombotic microangiopathy. There were 3 patients receiving renal biopsy. The pathological findings were mainly summarized as intimal thickening and stenosis of renal arterioles. Among 13 patients with long-term followed-up, 11 patients received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), 5 patients died, 2 patients were dialysis dependent. Only 1 patient stopped dialysis after the combination treatment of ACEI and endothelin receptor antagonist. Another 5 patients didn't need dialysis.
SRC usually occurred at the early course of SSc. dcSSc was more frequent than lcSSc. ACAs were rarely found in SRC patients. The immediate and sufficient use of ACEIs was still the cornerstone of SRC treatment. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonist in the treatment of SRC.
分析硬皮病肾危象(SRC)患者的临床特征、实验室检查、治疗方法及预后。
回顾性分析2004年5月至2013年5月在北京协和医院就诊的16例硬皮病肾危象患者的临床及实验室资料,并对其治疗方法及预后进行回顾性分析。
16例SRC患者中,男性5例,女性11例。SRC发病时的中位年龄为(49.9±12.3)岁。从系统性硬化症(SSc)诊断到SRC发作通常需要3.2年。10例SRC患者属于弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症(dcSSc),6例为局限性皮肤系统性硬化症(lcSSc)。SRC患者中,16/16例抗着丝点抗体(ACA)阴性。所有16例患者均有高血压和肾功能不全,其中8例在SRC发作后依赖透析,7例有血栓性微血管病。3例患者接受了肾活检。病理结果主要表现为肾小动脉内膜增厚和狭窄。13例长期随访患者中,11例接受了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)治疗,5例死亡,2例依赖透析。仅1例患者在ACEI与内皮素受体拮抗剂联合治疗后停止透析。另外5例患者无需透析。
SRC通常发生在SSc病程早期。dcSSc比lcSSc更常见。SRC患者很少发现ACA。立即充分使用ACEI仍然是SRC治疗的基石。未来需要研究评估内皮素受体拮抗剂在SRC治疗中的疗效。