Kahn Steven A, Iannuzzi James C, Stassen Nicole A, Bankey Paul E, Gestring Mark
Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):537-43. doi: 10.1177/000313481508100540.
Hospital quality metrics now reflect patient satisfaction and are measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. Understanding these metrics and drivers will be integral in providing quality care as this process evolves. This study identifies factors associated with patient satisfaction as determined by HCAHPS survey responses in trauma and acute care surgery patients. HCAHPS survey responses from acute care surgery and trauma patients at a single institution between 3/11 and 10/12 were analyzed. Logistic regression determined which responses to individual HCAHPS questions predicted highest hospital score (a rating of 9-10/10). Demographic and clinical variables were also analyzed as predictors of satisfaction. Subgroup analysis for trauma patients was performed. In 70.3 per cent of 182 total survey responses, a 9-10/10 score was given. The strongest predictors of highest hospital ranking were respect from doctors (odds ratio [OR] = 24.5, confidence interval [CI]: 5.44-110.4), doctors listening (OR: 9.33, CI: 3.7-23.5), nurses' listening (OR = 8.65, CI: 3.62-20.64), doctors' explanations (OR = 8.21, CI: 3.5-19.2), and attempts to control pain (OR = 7.71, CI: 3.22-18.46). Clinical factors and outcomes (complications, intensive care unit/hospital length of stay, mechanism of injury, and having an operation) were nonsignificant variables. For trauma patients, Injury Severity Score was inversely related to score (OR = 0.93, CI: 0.87-0.98). Insurance, education, and disposition were also tied to satisfaction, whereas age, gender, and ethnicity were nonsignificant. In conclusion, patient perception of interactions with the healthcare team was most strongly associated with satisfaction. Complications did not negatively influence satisfaction. Insurance status might potentially identify patients at risk of dissatisfaction. Listening to patients, treating them with respect, and explaining the care plan are integral to a positive perception of hospital stay.
医院质量指标现在反映患者满意度,并通过医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查来衡量。随着这一过程的发展,理解这些指标和驱动因素对于提供高质量护理至关重要。本研究确定了创伤和急性护理手术患者中由HCAHPS调查回复所决定的与患者满意度相关的因素。分析了一家机构在3/11至10/12期间急性护理手术和创伤患者的HCAHPS调查回复。逻辑回归确定了对HCAHPS各个问题的哪些回复预测了最高医院评分(9至10分中的评分)。人口统计学和临床变量也作为满意度的预测因素进行了分析。对创伤患者进行了亚组分析。在总共182份调查回复中,70.3%给出了9至10分的评分。医院排名最高的最强预测因素是医生的尊重(比值比[OR]=24.5,置信区间[CI]:5.44至110.4)、医生倾听(OR:9.33,CI:3.7至23.5)、护士倾听(OR=8.65,CI:3.62至20.64)、医生解释(OR=8.21,CI:3.5至19.2)以及控制疼痛的努力(OR=7.71,CI:3.22至18.46)。临床因素和结果(并发症、重症监护病房/住院时间、损伤机制以及进行手术)是无显著意义的变量。对于创伤患者,损伤严重程度评分与评分呈负相关(OR=0.93,CI:0.87至0.98)。保险、教育程度和出院情况也与满意度相关,而年龄、性别和种族则无显著意义。总之,患者对与医疗团队互动的感知与满意度最密切相关。并发症并未对满意度产生负面影响。保险状况可能潜在地识别出有不满意风险的患者。倾听患者意见、尊重对待他们并解释护理计划对于对住院的积极感知至关重要。