Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, 1142 Auckland, New Zealand.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:125-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Construction safety management involves complex issues (e.g., different trades, multi-organizational project structure, constantly changing work environment, and transient workforce). Systems thinking is widely considered as an effective approach to understanding and managing the complexity. This paper aims to better understand dynamic complexity of construction safety management by exploring archetypes of construction safety. To achieve this, this paper adopted the ground theory method (GTM) and 22 interviews were conducted with participants in various positions (government safety inspector, client, health and safety manager, safety consultant, safety auditor, and safety researcher). Eight archetypes were emerged from the collected data: (1) safety regulations, (2) incentive programs, (3) procurement and safety, (4) safety management in small businesses (5) production and safety, (6) workers' conflicting goals, (7) blame on workers, and (8) reactive and proactive learning. These archetypes capture the interactions between a wide range of factors within various hierarchical levels and subsystems. As a free-standing tool, they advance the understanding of dynamic complexity of construction safety management and provide systemic insights into dealing with the complexity. They also can facilitate system dynamics modelling of construction safety process.
建设工程安全管理涉及复杂的问题(例如,不同的行业、多组织项目结构、不断变化的工作环境和短暂的劳动力)。系统思维被广泛认为是理解和管理复杂性的有效方法。本文旨在通过探索建设工程安全管理的原型,更好地理解其动态复杂性。为此,本文采用了扎根理论方法(GTM),对来自不同职位的参与者(政府安全检查员、客户、健康和安全经理、安全顾问、安全审核员和安全研究人员)进行了 22 次访谈。从收集的数据中出现了八个原型:(1)安全法规,(2)激励计划,(3)采购与安全,(4)小企业的安全管理,(5)生产与安全,(6)工人的目标冲突,(7)归咎于工人,(8)被动与主动学习。这些原型捕捉到了各种层次结构和子系统内广泛因素之间的相互作用。作为一种独立的工具,它们提高了对建设工程安全管理动态复杂性的理解,并为处理复杂性提供了系统的见解。它们还可以促进建设工程安全过程的系统动力学建模。