• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任、选择与义务:南澳大利亚州结直肠癌筛查促进因素的定性研究

Trust, choice and obligation: a qualitative study of enablers of colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

作者信息

Ward Paul R, Coffey Cushla, Meyer Samantha

机构信息

Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, Australia.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, Waterloo University, Canada.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Sep;37(7):988-1006. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12280. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12280
PMID:25912247
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the second highest cancer prevalence and mortality rates in Australia. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) aims to increase early detection of CRC by offering free faecal occult blood testing. The NBCSP aims to offer choice to consumers about whether or not to participate in screening. This article presents data on trust, choice and perceived obligation to participate in the NBCSP by population groups with low uptake. A qualitative study was undertaken in South Australia. We interviewed 94 people from four culturally distinct groups: Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous peoples. This article demonstrates the complexity of factors shaping the choice, or lack thereof, to participate in the NBCSP. Informed choice is based on adequate knowledge, although this varied among our participants, highlighting the need for more health education in appropriate languages. An obligation to participate was found in the Iranian and Anglo-Australian groups and resulted from an established personal relationship with the doctor, a sense of duty, the acknowledgement of government investment and appreciation. Overall, this article makes a link between trust, choice and obligation, adding to literature on the sociology of trust and medical screening and highlighting important issues in the need of a policy and practice to improve CRC screening rates.

摘要

在澳大利亚,结直肠癌(CRC)的癌症患病率和死亡率位居第二。澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)旨在通过提供免费的粪便潜血检测来提高CRC的早期检测率。NBCSP旨在为消费者提供是否参与筛查的选择权。本文介绍了参与率较低的人群在信任、选择以及对参与NBCSP的感知义务方面的数据。在南澳大利亚进行了一项定性研究。我们采访了来自四个文化背景不同的群体的94人:希腊人、伊朗人、英裔澳大利亚人和原住民。本文展示了影响参与或不参与NBCSP选择的因素的复杂性。明智的选择基于充分的知识,尽管我们的参与者之间存在差异,这凸显了以适当语言进行更多健康教育的必要性。在伊朗人和英裔澳大利亚人群体中发现了参与的义务感,这源于与医生建立的个人关系、责任感、对政府投资的认可和感激之情。总体而言,本文建立了信任、选择和义务之间的联系,丰富了关于信任社会学和医学筛查的文献,并突出了在政策和实践方面提高CRC筛查率所需解决的重要问题。

相似文献

1
Trust, choice and obligation: a qualitative study of enablers of colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.信任、选择与义务:南澳大利亚州结直肠癌筛查促进因素的定性研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Sep;37(7):988-1006. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12280. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
2
Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.对结直肠癌筛查的机构(不)信任:一项针对希腊、伊朗、英裔澳大利亚人和原住民群体的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2915-27. doi: 10.1111/hex.12276. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
3
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.基于粪便潜血检测(FOBT)的结直肠癌筛查趋势及未使用的预测因素:南澳大利亚地区的研究结果及对提高FOBT接受率的启示
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126.
4
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it?结直肠癌筛查的公平性:哪些群体参与度不公平,我们对此能做些什么?
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):334-46. doi: 10.1071/PY11055.
5
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Prevalence of FOB testing in eastern-Australian general practice patients: what has a national bowel cancer screening program delivered?澳大利亚东部全科医疗患者中粪便潜血检测的普及率:国家肠癌筛查计划带来了什么?
Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Apr;26(1):39-44. doi: 10.1071/HE14058.
7
Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.与澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查参与相关的因素:45 岁及以上研究队列的结果。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
8
Bowel cancer screening--a role for general practice.肠癌筛查——全科医疗的作用
Aust Fam Physician. 2009 Apr;38(4):200-3.
9
Barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in different population subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia.南澳大利亚阿德莱德不同人群亚组中结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。
Med J Aust. 2012 May 7;196(8):521-3. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10701.
10
Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.提高澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的参与度和投资效益,改善其结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 3;15(2):e0227899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227899. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
How eHealth use and cancer information-seeking influence older adults' acceptance of genetic testing: Mediating roles of PIGI and cancer worry.电子健康的使用和癌症信息寻求如何影响老年人对基因检测的接受度:PIGI和癌症担忧的中介作用。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 31;11:20552076251317658. doi: 10.1177/20552076251317658. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The Role of Boundary Spanning in Building Trust: A Place-Based Study on Engaging Hardly Reached Groups in Community Healthcare Settings.跨界在建立信任中的作用:一项关于在社区医疗环境中吸引难以接触群体参与的基于地点的研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13870. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13870.
3
Acceptability of adding a non-contrast abdominal CT scan to screen for kidney cancer and other abdominal pathology within a community-based CT screening programme for lung cancer: A qualitative study.
在基于社区的肺癌 CT 筛查计划中,加入非增强腹部 CT 扫描筛查肾癌和其他腹部病变的可接受性:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0300313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300313. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.
5
Cancer Screening Services: What Do Indigenous Communities Want? A Systematic Review.癌症筛查服务:原住民社区想要什么?系统评价。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Feb;10:e2300035. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00035.
6
Examining social class as it relates to heuristics women use to determine the trustworthiness of information regarding the link between alcohol and breast cancer risk.探讨社会阶层与女性用于确定有关酒精与乳腺癌风险之间关联信息可信度的启发式方法之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0270936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270936. eCollection 2022.
7
Why do people take part in atrial fibrillation screening? Qualitative interview study in English primary care.为什么人们参与心房颤动筛查?英国初级保健中的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e051703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051703.
8
Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women's perceptions of cervical cancer screening.信任与癌症筛查:筛查争议对女性宫颈癌筛查认知的影响
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec 27;25:101684. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Revisiting Candidacy: What Might It Offer Cancer Prevention?重新审视癌症候选人:它能为癌症预防带来什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910157.
10
Attitude Toward Prostate Cancer Screening in Hong Kong: The Importance of Perceived Consequence and Anticipated Regret.香港人对前列腺癌筛查的态度:感知后果和预期遗憾的重要性。
Am J Mens Health. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):15579883211051442. doi: 10.1177/15579883211051442.