Hydroxyapatite ocular implant and non-integrated implants in eviscerated patients.

INTRODUCTION

This study compares the outcomes and complications of hydroxyapatite ocular implant and non-integrated ocular implants following evisceration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 90 patients who underwent evisceration for different ocular affections, in the Ophthalmology Department of the University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, between January 2009 and December 2013. The outcomes measured were conjunctival dehiscence, socket infection, implant exposure and extrusion rate.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients had the hydroxyapatite implant (coralline-Integrated Ocular Implants, USA or synthetic-FCI, France) and forty-seven received non-integrated ocular implants (24 acrylic and 23 silicone). Five cases of socket infection, thirteen cases of extrusion and two cases of conjunctival dehiscence were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a higher rate of conjunctival dehiscence with hydroxyapatite ocular implant, but implant extrusion and socket infection were found in non-integrated ocular implants.