Suppr超能文献

依折麦布对主要心血管终点事件的临床疗效及安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析

Clinical efficacy and safety of Ezetimibe on major cardiovascular endpoints: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Battaggia Alessandro, Donzelli Alberto, Font Maria, Molteni Davide, Galvano Antonio

机构信息

Infofarma Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria 20, Verona, Italy.

Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124587. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about Ezetimibe's efficacy on patient-oriented outcomes have given discordant results. The aim of this study was to determine the net effect of Ezetimibe and of the widely marketed combination, Ezetimibe+simvastatin, on mortality and morbidity outcomes.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched for RCT on Ezetimibe using MEDLINE, CCTR, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to December 2013, Merck and Novartis online registers, and personal communications. Two authors independently selected trials fulfilling these criteria: RCTs comparing Ezetimibe±statin or another lipid-lowering drug against placebo, or against the same lipid-lowering drug at the same dosage, with a follow-up at least 24 weeks and one or more of these outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cancer, serious adverse events (SAEs); we assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane checklist. We extracted the data for major clinical events as a dichotomous measure, with the patient the unit of analysis. Pooled analysis was done with random and fixed effect based models. Trials comparing Ezetimibe plus a lipid-lowering drug against the same lipidlowering drug representing the net effect of Ezetimibe, showed a nonsignificant tendency toward damage for cancer, MI, stroke and SAEs. Ezetimibe+simvastatin vs. simvastatin alone showed a stronger tendency towards a higher risk for all-cause death (2.52; 0.65-9.74), CV death (3.04; 0.48-19.21), non-CV death (3.03; 0.12-73.50), MI (1.91; 0.42-8.70), stroke (2.38; 0.46-12.35), cancer (RR 11.11; 0.62-198.29), and SAEs (1.45; 0.95-2.23). Limitations include small numbers of events and inadequate power of the pooling. Trials comparing Ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo showed non-significant effects: MI (0.81; 0.66-1.00 p = 0.051), all-cause death (1.02; 0.95-1.09), CV death (0.91; 0.80-1.04), non-CV death (108; 0.99-1.18), stroke (0.86; 0.72-1.04), cancer (1.18; 0.80-1.74), SAEs (1.01; 0.96-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Ezetimibe±simvastatin had inconsistent effects on important outcomes. No firm conclusions are possible, but findings indicative of damage suggest much more selective use of Ezetimibe±simvastatin.

摘要

背景

关于依折麦布对以患者为导向的结局的疗效的随机临床试验(RCT)给出了不一致的结果。本研究的目的是确定依折麦布以及广泛上市的复方制剂依折麦布+辛伐他汀对死亡率和发病率结局的净效应。

方法与结果

我们检索了截至2013年12月的MEDLINE、CCTR、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov数据库、默克和诺华在线注册库以及个人通讯中的依折麦布随机对照试验。两位作者独立选择符合以下标准的试验:将依折麦布±他汀或另一种降脂药物与安慰剂进行比较,或与相同剂量的相同降脂药物进行比较的随机对照试验,随访至少24周且有以下一项或多项结局:全因死亡率、心血管(CV)死亡率、中风、心肌梗死(MI)、癌症、严重不良事件(SAE);我们使用Cochrane清单评估偏倚风险。我们将主要临床事件的数据提取为二分法测量,以患者作为分析单位。采用基于随机和固定效应的模型进行汇总分析。将依折麦布加一种降脂药物与相同降脂药物进行比较以显示依折麦布净效应的试验,在癌症、心肌梗死、中风和严重不良事件方面显示出对损害的非显著倾向。依折麦布+辛伐他汀与单独使用辛伐他汀相比,在全因死亡(2.52;0.65 - 9.74)、心血管死亡(3.04;0.48 - 19.21)、非心血管死亡(3.03;0.12 - 73.50)、心肌梗死(1.91;0.42 - 8.70)、中风(2.38;0.46 - 12.35)、癌症(风险比11.11;0.62 - 198.29)和严重不良事件(1.45;0.95 - 2.23)方面有更高风险的更强倾向。局限性包括事件数量少和汇总的效力不足。将依折麦布+辛伐他汀与安慰剂进行比较的试验显示无显著效应:心肌梗死(0.81;0.66 - 1.00,p = 0.051)、全因死亡(1.02;0.95 - 1.09)、心血管死亡(0.91;0.80 - 1.04)、非心血管死亡(1.08;0.99 - 1.18)、中风(0.86;0.72 - 1.04)、癌症(1.18;0.80 - 1.74)、严重不良事件(1.01;0.96 - 1.06)。

结论

依折麦布±辛伐他汀对重要结局的影响不一致。无法得出确凿结论,但表明有损害的研究结果提示应更有选择性地使用依折麦布±辛伐他汀。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66c/4411142/aab82fa17fc5/pone.0124587.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验