• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜂蜜蛋白作为蜂蜜掺假稳定碳同位素比率检测的内标物。

Honey protein as internal standard for stable carbon isotope ratio detection of adulteration of honey.

作者信息

White J W, Winters K

机构信息

Honeydata Corp., Navasota TX 77868.

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1989 Nov-Dec;72(6):907-11.

PMID:2592312
Abstract

Using the difference in stable carbon isotope ratio between a honey and its protein fraction permits objective evaluation of possible adulteration of honey with small amounts (7-20%) as well as larger amounts of corn or cane sugar. The present uncertainty in interpretation of results from pure honey with delta 13C values outside the generally accepted limits for pure honey of -27.5% to -23.5% is eliminated; likewise TLC testing to resolve questionable samples with delta 13C values between -23.5 and -21.5% is not needed. Fifty certified samples of pure honey were used to establish criteria for purity, and 38 other samples with delta 13C values in the "questionable" or "adulterated" range for the AOAC official method were tested. A difference of 1.0% or more between honey and protein fractions is proposed to indicate adulteration.

摘要

利用蜂蜜与其蛋白质部分稳定碳同位素比率的差异,能够客观评估蜂蜜是否可能被少量(7 - 20%)以及大量的玉米或蔗糖掺假。纯蜂蜜的δ13C值超出纯蜂蜜普遍接受的-27.5%至-23.5%范围时,目前结果解释中的不确定性得以消除;同样,也无需进行薄层层析测试来分辨δ13C值在-23.5%至-21.5%之间的可疑样品。使用50个经认证的纯蜂蜜样品来建立纯度标准,并对另外38个AOAC官方方法中δ13C值处于“可疑”或“掺假”范围的样品进行了测试。提议蜂蜜与其蛋白质部分之间的差异达到1.0%或更大时,表明存在掺假情况。

相似文献

1
Honey protein as internal standard for stable carbon isotope ratio detection of adulteration of honey.蜂蜜蛋白作为蜂蜜掺假稳定碳同位素比率检测的内标物。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1989 Nov-Dec;72(6):907-11.
2
Detection of adulterated honey produced by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies fed with different levels of commercial industrial sugar (C₃ and C₄ plants) syrups by the carbon isotope ratio analysis.利用碳同位素比分析检测饲喂不同水平商业工业糖(C₃ 和 C₄ 植物)糖浆的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)群体生产的掺假蜂蜜。
Food Chem. 2014 Jul 15;155:155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.033. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
3
Liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry: a new perspective on honey adulteration detection.液相色谱-同位素比率质谱联用技术:蜂蜜掺假检测的新视角
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Dec 27;54(26):9719-27. doi: 10.1021/jf062067x.
4
Carbon and nitrogen natural stable isotopes in Slovene honey: adulteration and botanical and geographical aspects.斯洛文尼亚蜂蜜中的碳和氮天然稳定同位素:掺假及植物学和地理学方面。
J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Dec 22;58(24):12794-803. doi: 10.1021/jf102940s. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
Detection of adulteration in honey samples added various sugar syrups with 13C/12C isotope ratio analysis method.采用 13C/12C 同位素比率分析法检测添加了各种糖浆的蜂蜜样品中的掺假情况。
Food Chem. 2013 Jun 1;138(2-3):1629-32. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.068. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
6
Eliminating false positive C4 sugar tests on New Zealand Manuka honey.消除新西兰麦卢卡蜂蜜 C4 糖检测的假阳性。
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010 Aug 30;24(16):2370-4. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4642.
7
Carbon isotope ratio (13C/12C) of pine honey and detection of HFCS adulteration.松蜜的碳同位素比值(13C/12C)和 HFCS 掺假的检测。
Food Chem. 2014 Aug 15;157:10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
Gas-liquid chromatographic test for honey adulteration by high fructose corn sirup.气相色谱法检测蜂蜜中是否掺有高果糖玉米糖浆。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979 Jan;62(1):186-9.
9
Sensitive thin layer chromatographic detection of high fructose corn sirup and other adulterants in honey.蜂蜜中高果糖玉米糖浆及其他掺假物的灵敏薄层色谱检测
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979 Jul;62(4):917-20.
10
A new methodology based on GC-MS to detect honey adulteration with commercial syrups.一种基于气相色谱-质谱联用技术检测蜂蜜中掺入商业糖浆的新方法。
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Sep 5;55(18):7264-9. doi: 10.1021/jf070559j. Epub 2007 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Authentication of Indian Honey Based on Carbon Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis-Verification of Indian Regulatory Criteria.基于碳稳定同位素比率分析的印度蜂蜜认证——印度监管标准的验证
Foods. 2025 Apr 8;14(8):1289. doi: 10.3390/foods14081289.
2
Stable carbon isotopic characterization of rice vinegar protein as an intrinsic reference for discriminating the authenticity of brewed rice vinegar.稳定碳同位素特征分析表明,酿造米醋中的蛋白质可以作为区分其真伪的内源性参考物质。
J Food Drug Anal. 2022 Mar 15;30(1):38-45. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3398.
3
Evaluation of honey authenticity in Lebanon by analysis of carbon stable isotope ratio using elemental analyzer and liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry.
通过使用元素分析仪和液相色谱-同位素比率质谱联用仪分析碳稳定同位素比率来评估黎巴嫩蜂蜜的真伪。
J Mass Spectrom. 2021 Apr 15;56(6):e4730. doi: 10.1002/jms.4730.
4
The sources and quality of Iranian honey.伊朗蜂蜜的来源与质量。
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 10;7(4):e06651. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06651. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Development of Fast Analytical Method for the Detection and Quantification of Honey Adulteration Using Vibrational Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Tools.利用振动光谱和化学计量学工具开发用于检测和定量蜂蜜掺假的快速分析方法
J Anal Methods Chem. 2020 Dec 23;2020:8816249. doi: 10.1155/2020/8816249. eCollection 2020.
6
Differentiating pasture honey from eucalyptus honey based on carbon isotopic data in Uruguay.基于乌拉圭碳同位素数据区分牧草蜂蜜和桉树蜂蜜。
Heliyon. 2019 Mar 7;5(3):e01228. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01228. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
Novel polyclonal antibody-based rapid gold sandwich immunochromatographic strip for detecting the major royal jelly protein 1 (MRJP1) in honey.基于新型多克隆抗体的快速金免疫渗滤层析法检测蜂蜜中主要蜂王浆蛋白 1(MRJP1)
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212335. eCollection 2019.
8
Authenticity and geographic origin of global honeys determined using carbon isotope ratios and trace elements.利用碳同位素比值和微量元素鉴定全球蜂蜜的真实性和地理来源。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 2;8(1):14639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32764-w.
9
Carbon Stable-Isotope and Physicochemical Data as a Possible Tool to Differentiate between Honey-Production Environments in Uruguay.碳稳定同位素和物理化学数据作为区分乌拉圭蜂蜜生产环境的一种可能工具。
Foods. 2018 Jun 6;7(6):86. doi: 10.3390/foods7060086.