• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同方法在一家三级儿科护理中心检测产志贺毒素大肠埃希菌的比较。

Comparison of three different methods for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in a tertiary pediatric care center.

机构信息

Département de Microbiologie et Immunologie, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):481-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02219-12. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.02219-12
PMID:23175264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3553904/
Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a well-known cause of sporadic and epidemic food-borne gastroenteritis. A low infectious dose, approximately 10 microorganisms, is sufficient to cause disease that may lead to hemolytic-uremic syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare the performances of an in-house real-time PCR, a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Premier EHEC; Meridian Bioscience), and culture on sorbitol MacConkey agar for the detection of STEC in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Of 632 stool samples tested, 21 were positive for STEC. All were detected by PCR, 6 were detected by EIA, and only 5 O157 STEC isolates were identified by culture. Among the 15 specimens falsely negative by EIA, there were 9 Stx1, 2 Stx2, and 4 Stx1 and Stx2 STEC isolates. The latter group included 2 O157 STEC isolates that would have been missed if only EIA had been performed. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study performed in a pediatric hospital which demonstrates the superiority of PCR over EIA for the detection of STEC. We conclude that PCR is specific and more sensitive than EIA. PCR should be considered for routine use in clinical settings where molecular detection facilities are available. Its lower limit of detection, equivalent to the infectious dose, is an obvious advantage for patient care and public health surveillance.

摘要

产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)是一种众所周知的散发性和流行性食源性肠胃炎的病因。感染剂量低,约 10 个微生物,足以引起可能导致溶血性尿毒综合征的疾病。本研究的目的是比较内部实时 PCR、商业酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)(Premier EHEC;Meridian Bioscience)和在山梨醇麦康凯琼脂上培养对三级儿科医院中 STEC 的检测性能。在检测的 632 份粪便样本中,有 21 份 STEC 呈阳性。所有这些都是通过 PCR 检测到的,6 种是通过 EIA 检测到的,只有 5 种 O157 STEC 分离株通过培养鉴定。在 15 份 EIA 假阴性标本中,有 9 株为 Stx1,2 株为 Stx2,4 株为 Stx1 和 Stx2 STEC 分离株。后者包括 2 株 O157 STEC 分离株,如果仅进行 EIA,这些分离株将被遗漏。据我们所知,这是首次在儿科医院进行的前瞻性研究,证明了 PCR 检测 STEC 的优势优于 EIA。我们得出结论,PCR 比 EIA 更具特异性和敏感性。在有分子检测设施的临床环境中,应考虑将 PCR 常规用于临床。其检测下限与感染剂量相当,这对患者护理和公共卫生监测具有明显优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three different methods for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in a tertiary pediatric care center.三种不同方法在一家三级儿科护理中心检测产志贺毒素大肠埃希菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):481-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02219-12. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
2
Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from Clinical Samples.用于从临床样本中检测和区分产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的实时聚合酶链反应检测法
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2148-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00115-15. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
3
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: a single-center, 11-year pediatric experience.产志贺毒素大肠杆菌:一项单中心11年的儿科经验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3647-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01231-14. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in children: diagnosis and clinical manifestations of O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 infection.产志贺毒素大肠杆菌在儿童中的感染:O157:H7 和非-O157:H7 感染的诊断和临床表现。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):955-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02119-10. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
5
Rapid and sensitive detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli directly from stool samples by real-time PCR in comparison to culture, enzyme immunoassay and Vero cell cytotoxicity assay.与培养法、酶免疫测定法和Vero细胞细胞毒性测定法相比,通过实时PCR直接从粪便样本中快速灵敏地检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌。
Clin Lab. 2011;57(11-12):993-8.
6
Comparison between ImmunoCard STAT!(®) and real-time PCR as screening tools for both O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Southern Alberta, Canada.比较 ImmunoCard STAT!(®)与实时 PCR 在加拿大阿尔伯塔省南部作为 O157:H7 和非 O157 产志贺毒素大肠埃希菌筛查工具的效果。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;77(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
Evaluation of performance and potential clinical impact of ProSpecT Shiga toxin Escherichia coli microplate assay for detection of Shiga Toxin-producing E. coli in stool samples.评估ProSpecT志贺毒素大肠杆菌微孔板检测法在粪便样本中检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的性能及潜在临床影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;42(4):1652-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1652-1656.2004.
8
A sensitive multiplex, real-time PCR assay for prospective detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from stool samples reveals similar incidences but variable severities of non-O157 and O157 infections in northern California.一种敏感的多重实时 PCR 检测方法,可用于前瞻性检测粪便样本中的产志贺毒素大肠杆菌,结果表明在加利福尼亚北部,非 O157 和 O157 感染的发生率相似,但严重程度不同。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):3000-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00991-13. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Clinical Evaluation and Cost Analysis of Great Basin Shiga Toxin Direct Molecular Assay for Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Diarrheal Stool Specimens.大盆地志贺毒素直接分子检测法用于检测腹泻粪便标本中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的临床评估与成本分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Feb;55(2):519-525. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01939-16. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
A multiple protocol to improve diagnosis and isolation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from human stool specimens.一种用于改善从人类粪便标本中诊断和分离产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的多重方案。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Sep;62(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advancements in Technologies to Detect Enterohaemorrhagic Shiga Toxins.检测肠出血性志贺毒素技术的最新进展。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 May 28;33(5):559-573. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2212.12025. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
A sandwich-type bacteriophage-based amperometric biosensor for the detection of Shiga toxin-producing serogroups in complex matrices.一种基于三明治型噬菌体的安培生物传感器,用于检测复杂基质中产生志贺毒素的血清群。
RSC Adv. 2020 Sep 30;10(59):35765-35775. doi: 10.1039/d0ra06223e. eCollection 2020 Sep 28.
3
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification and PCR Methods in Detection of Foodborne Microorganisms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.环介导等温扩增法和聚合酶链反应法检测食源微生物的敏感性和特异性:系统评价与Meta分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Nov;50(11):2172-2182. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7571.
4
Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia/Pneumonia Plus Panel for Detection and Quantification of Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.BioFire FilmArray肺炎/肺炎加检测板用于下呼吸道感染病原体检测和定量的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 24;58(7). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00128-20.
5
Shiga Toxin-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Narrative Review.志贺毒素相关性溶血尿毒综合征:一篇叙述性综述。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;12(2):67. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020067.
6
Point-of-Need DNA Testing for Detection of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria.即时检测食品源致病菌的 DNA 测试
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 4;19(5):1100. doi: 10.3390/s19051100.
7
The Bacteriology and Its Virulence Factors in Neonatal Infections: Threats to Child Survival Strategies.新生儿感染中的细菌学及其毒力因子:对儿童生存策略的威胁
J Pathog. 2018 Jul 2;2018:4801247. doi: 10.1155/2018/4801247. eCollection 2018.
8
and hemolytic uremic syndrome: A case report and literature review.以及溶血性尿毒症综合征:一例病例报告及文献综述。
IDCases. 2017 Feb 10;8:6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2017.02.003. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray® GastrointestinalPanel in a Midwestern Academic Hospital.中西部一家学术医院中BioFire FilmArray®胃肠道检测板的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;36(4):747-754. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2858-7. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
10
Clinical Evaluation and Cost Analysis of Great Basin Shiga Toxin Direct Molecular Assay for Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Diarrheal Stool Specimens.大盆地志贺毒素直接分子检测法用于检测腹泻粪便标本中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的临床评估与成本分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Feb;55(2):519-525. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01939-16. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory practices and incidence of non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections.实验室操作与非 O157 型志贺毒素产生大肠杆菌感染的发生率。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;18(3):477-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1803.111358.
2
Epidemiology of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli in Australia, 2000-2010.澳大利亚 2000-2010 年产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 21;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-63.
3
Prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli as detected by enzyme-linked immunoassays and real-time PCR during the summer months in northern Alberta, Canada.加拿大阿尔伯塔省北部夏季通过酶联免疫吸附测定法和实时 PCR 检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的流行情况。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Dec;49(12):4307-10. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05211-11. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
4
Counterpoint: Should all stools be screened for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli?对立观点:是否应对所有粪便进行产志贺毒素大肠杆菌筛查?
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2394-7.
5
Origins of the E. coli strain causing an outbreak of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in Germany.导致德国爆发溶血性尿毒综合征的大肠杆菌菌株的起源。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 25;365(8):709-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106920. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Characteristics of the enteroaggregative Shiga toxin/verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 strain causing the outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Germany, May to June 2011.2011 年 5 月至 6 月德国肠聚集性志贺样毒素/肠出血性大肠杆菌 O104:H4 引起溶血尿毒综合征暴发的特征。
Euro Surveill. 2011 Jun 16;16(24):19889. doi: 10.2807/ese.16.24.19889-en.
7
Laboratory practices for the identification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in the United States, FoodNet sites, 2007.美国食品网监测点 2007 年志贺毒素产生型大肠埃希氏菌检测的实验室实践。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 Apr;8(4):555-60. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0764. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
8
Comparison of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli detection methods using clinical stool samples.采用临床粪便样本比较产志贺毒素大肠杆菌检测方法。
J Mol Diagn. 2010 Jul;12(4):469-75. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090221. Epub 2010 May 13.
9
Recommendations for diagnosis of shiga toxin--producing Escherichia coli infections by clinical laboratories.临床实验室对产志贺毒素大肠杆菌感染的诊断建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Oct 16;58(RR-12):1-14.
10
Hemolytic-uremic syndrome in Switzerland: a nationwide surveillance 1997-2003.瑞士溶血尿毒综合征:1997-2003 年全国性监测。
Eur J Pediatr. 2010 May;169(5):591-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1079-9. Epub 2009 Oct 15.