Entradas Marta
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE - IUL), DINÂMIA'CET, Lisboa, Portugal
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jul;25(5):603-11. doi: 10.1177/0963662515579838. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
Studies on experts' understanding of the public have mainly focused on the views of scientists. We add to the literature on constructions of the public by analyzing the views of decision-makers, professional science communicators and scientists involved in 'space' communication on the public and public participation in policy. Findings show that contextual situations and roles determine the way the public is conceptualised: the public is sophisticated and knowledgeable to participate in space activities/citizen science, but in matters of policy, a gullible image of the public is brought up. Despite the democratic talk on participation, practitioners delimited public involvement in policy in some way or other to protect their own power and decision-making capabilities. This conception of the public competes with the stated aims of scientific and political institutions for public engagement and the substantive value of public participation, leaving a limited role for the public in space policymaking.
关于专家对公众的理解的研究主要集中在科学家的观点上。我们通过分析参与“太空”传播的决策者、专业科学传播者和科学家对公众及公众参与政策的看法,为有关公众建构的文献增添了内容。研究结果表明,背景情况和角色决定了公众的概念化方式:公众在参与太空活动/公民科学方面经验丰富且知识渊博,但在政策问题上,公众却被塑造成易受骗的形象。尽管有关于参与的民主讨论,但从业者以某种方式限制了公众在政策方面的参与,以保护他们自己的权力和决策能力。这种对公众的概念与科学和政治机构所宣称的公众参与目标以及公众参与的实质价值相冲突,使得公众在太空政策制定中发挥的作用有限。