• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
VULNERABILITY TO HURRICANE DAMAGE ON THE U.S. GULF COAST SINCE 1950.自1950年以来美国墨西哥湾沿岸遭受飓风破坏的脆弱性
Geogr Rev. 2015 Apr;105(2):133-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12064.x.
2
Trapped in Place? Segmented Resilience to Hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, 1970-2005.被困原地?1970 - 2005年墨西哥湾沿岸对飓风的分段适应能力
Demography. 2016 Oct;53(5):1511-1534. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0496-4.
3
Determinants of Hurricane Evacuation from a Large Representative Sample of the U.S. Gulf Coast.美国墨西哥湾沿岸大代表性样本中飓风疏散的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 3;16(21):4268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214268.
4
Spatial heterogeneities of current and future hurricane flood risk along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf coasts.美国大西洋和墨西哥湾沿岸当前和未来飓风洪水风险的空间异质性。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 15;713:136704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136704. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Public health response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita--Louisiana, 2005.2005年路易斯安那州对卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风的公共卫生应对措施
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Jan 20;55(2):29-30.
6
The effect of Hurricane Katrina: births in the U.S. Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm.卡特里娜飓风的影响:美国墨西哥湾沿岸地区风暴前后的出生情况。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009 Aug 28;58(2):1-28, 32.
7
Self-Rated Mental and Physical Health of U.S. Gulf Coast Residents.美国墨西哥湾沿岸居民的自评精神和身体健康状况。
J Community Health. 2020 Jun;45(3):598-605. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00779-7.
8
Quantifying the hurricane catastrophe risk to offshore wind power.量化海上风力发电的飓风灾害风险。
Risk Anal. 2013 Dec;33(12):2126-41. doi: 10.1111/risa.12085. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Disaster preparedness of dialysis patients for Hurricanes Gustav and Ike 2008.2008年透析患者针对古斯塔夫飓风和艾克飓风的灾难准备情况。
Adv Perit Dial. 2009;25:62-7.
10
Coastal emergency managers' preferences for storm surge forecast communication.沿海地区应急管理人员对风暴潮预报信息传达的偏好。
J Emerg Manag. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):153-60. doi: 10.5055/jem.2014.0169.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic vulnerability and differential impact of severe weather-induced power outages.社会经济脆弱性与极端天气引发的停电造成的差异影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Oct 3;2(10):pgad295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad295. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
How neighborhood environment modified the effects of power outages on multiple health outcomes in New York state?纽约州的邻里环境如何改变停电对多种健康结果的影响?
Hyg Environ Health Adv. 2022 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.heha.2022.100039. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
3
Compound hazards: An examination of how hurricane protective actions could increase transmission risk of COVID-19.复合风险:关于飓风防护措施如何可能增加新冠病毒传播风险的考察
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Nov;65:102560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102560. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
DIFFERENTIAL RECOVERY MIGRATION ACROSS THE RURAL-URBAN GRADIENT: MINIMAL AND SHORT-TERM POPULATION GAINS FOR RURAL DISASTER-AFFECTED GULF COAST COUNTIES.城乡梯度上的差异恢复迁移:墨西哥湾沿岸受灾农村县的人口增长微乎其微且为期短暂
Rural Sociol. 2020 Dec;85(4):856-898. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12305. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
5
Trapped in Place? Segmented Resilience to Hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, 1970-2005.被困原地?1970 - 2005年墨西哥湾沿岸对飓风的分段适应能力
Demography. 2016 Oct;53(5):1511-1534. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0496-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.种族、社会经济地位以及卡特里娜飓风后返回新奥尔良的回迁情况。
Popul Environ. 2010 Jan;31(1-3):20-42. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0092-2.
2
Atlantic hurricanes and climate over the past 1,500 years.过去1500年的大西洋飓风与气候
Nature. 2009 Aug 13;460(7257):880-3. doi: 10.1038/nature08219.
3
Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.过去30年热带气旋的破坏性不断增强。
Nature. 2005 Aug 4;436(7051):686-8. doi: 10.1038/nature03906. Epub 2005 Jul 31.
4
Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight.邻里机制与出生体重的空间动态
AJS. 2003 Mar;108(5):976-1017. doi: 10.1086/374405.
5
A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science.可持续性科学中脆弱性分析的一个框架。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8074-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100. Epub 2003 Jun 5.
6
Neighborhood support and the birth weight of urban infants.邻里支持与城市婴儿的出生体重。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 1;157(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf170.
7
Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis.邻里环境与冠心病:多层次分析
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jul 1;146(1):48-63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009191.

自1950年以来美国墨西哥湾沿岸遭受飓风破坏的脆弱性

VULNERABILITY TO HURRICANE DAMAGE ON THE U.S. GULF COAST SINCE 1950.

作者信息

Logan John R, Xu Zengwang

机构信息

Professor in the sociology department of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02910.

Professor in the geography department of the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201.

出版信息

Geogr Rev. 2015 Apr;105(2):133-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12064.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12064.x
PMID:25926706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4410365/
Abstract

We study hurricane risk on the U.S. Gulf Coast during 1950-2005, estimating the wind damage and storm surge from every hurricane in this extended period. Wind damage is estimated from the known path and wind speeds of individual storms and calibrated to fit actual damage reports for a sample of Gulf Coast storms. Storm surge is estimated using the SLOSH model developed by NOAA. These models provide the first comprehensive overview of the hurricane storm hazard as it has been experienced over a fifty-six-year period. We link the estimated damage with information on the population and specific socio-demographic components of the population (by age, race, and poverty status). Results show that white, young adult, and nonpoor populations have shifted over time away from zones with higher risk of wind damage, while more vulnerable population groups-the elderly, African Americans, and poor-have moved in the opposite direction. All groups have moved away from areas with high risk of storm surge since 1970. But in this case, perhaps because living near the water is still perceived as an amenity, those at highest risk are whites, elderly, and nonpoor households. Here exposure represents a trade-off between the risk and the amenity.

摘要

我们研究了1950年至2005年期间美国墨西哥湾沿岸的飓风风险,估算了这一较长时期内每场飓风造成的风灾损失和风暴潮。风灾损失是根据单个风暴已知的路径和风速估算得出,并进行校准以符合墨西哥湾沿岸部分风暴的实际损失报告。风暴潮是使用美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)开发的SLOSH模型估算的。这些模型首次全面概述了56年期间经历过的飓风风暴危害。我们将估算的损失与人口信息以及人口的特定社会人口组成部分(按年龄、种族和贫困状况)相关联。结果表明,随着时间的推移,白人、年轻成年人以及非贫困人群已从风灾风险较高的地区迁出,而更脆弱的人群——老年人、非裔美国人以及贫困人口——则朝着相反的方向迁移。自1970年以来,所有群体都已搬离风暴潮风险高的地区。但在这种情况下,或许是因为住在水边仍被视为一种便利,风险最高的是白人、老年人以及非贫困家庭。这里,暴露代表了风险与便利之间的权衡。