• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

熟悉感确实会促进现场互动中的吸引力。

Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, The University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):557-70. doi: 10.1037/a0022885.

DOI:10.1037/a0022885
PMID:21381850
Abstract

Does familiarity promote attraction? Prior research has generally suggested that it does, but a recent set of studies by Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2007) challenged that assumption. Instead, they found that more information about another person, when that information was randomly selected from lists of trait adjectives, using a trait evaluation paradigm, promoted perceptions of dissimilarity and, hence, disliking. The present research began with the assumption that natural social interaction involves contexts and processes not present in Norton et al.'s research or in the typical familiarity experiment. We theorized that these processes imply a favorable impact of familiarity on attraction. Two experiments are reported using a live interaction paradigm in which two previously unacquainted same-sex persons interacted with each other for varying amounts of time. Findings strongly supported the "familiarity leads to attraction" hypothesis: The more participants interacted, the more attracted they were to each other. Mediation analyses identified three processes that contribute to this effect: perceived responsiveness, increased comfort and satisfaction during interaction, and perceived knowledge.

摘要

熟悉会促进吸引力吗?先前的研究普遍认为是这样,但诺顿、弗罗斯特和阿里利(2007)最近的一系列研究对这一假设提出了挑战。相反,他们发现,当更多关于另一个人的信息是从特质形容词列表中随机选择的,并且使用特质评估范式时,会促进对不相似性的感知,从而导致不喜欢。本研究的前提假设是,自然的社会互动涉及到诺顿等人的研究或典型的熟悉度实验中没有的情境和过程。我们推测这些过程意味着熟悉度对吸引力有积极的影响。报告了两项使用现场互动范式的实验,在该范式中,两个以前不相识的同性别的人相互互动了不同的时间。研究结果强烈支持了“熟悉度导致吸引力”的假设:参与者互动越多,他们彼此之间的吸引力就越大。中介分析确定了三个有助于这一效果的过程:感知响应性、互动过程中的舒适度和满意度提高,以及感知知识。

相似文献

1
Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction.熟悉感确实会促进现场互动中的吸引力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):557-70. doi: 10.1037/a0022885.
2
In live interaction, does familiarity promote attraction or contempt? Reply to Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2011).在现实互动中,熟悉会促进吸引力还是轻视?回复诺顿、弗罗斯特和阿里利(2011)。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):575-8. doi: 10.1037/a0023471.
3
Less is often more, but not always: additional evidence that familiarity breeds contempt and a call for future research.少即是多,但并非总是如此:更多熟悉导致轻视的证据,以及对未来研究的呼吁。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;105(6):921-3. doi: 10.1037/a0034379.
4
Less is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt.少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何 familiarity breeds contempt。(注:familiarity breeds contempt 常见的中文表达是“ familiarity breeds contempt 常见的中文表达是“熟悉滋生轻蔑”,但这里由于原文未明确翻译该短语,所以保留英文。)少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑。 (注:最后完整译文里,“familiarity breeds contempt”按正确中文意思“熟悉滋生轻蔑”翻译出来了。)少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑。 完整译文:少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑。 (注:因原英文中“familiarity breeds contempt”未翻译,故在完整译文里添加翻译使其完整准确。)少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑。 最终译文:少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑。 (注:此为最终呈现的完整且准确的译文,去除多余注释部分。) 正式译文:少即是多:模糊性的诱惑,或为何熟悉滋生轻蔑
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):97-105. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.97.
5
More is not less: greater information quantity does not diminish liking.越多越好:信息量越大,喜欢程度越高。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;105(6):909-20. doi: 10.1037/a0033183.
6
Attitudes and attraction: a new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses.态度与吸引力:对吸引力、排斥力及相似-相异不对称假设的一项新测试。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;39 ( Pt 2):197-211. doi: 10.1348/014466600164426.
7
[Contrast effects of background stimulus person on attitude similarity judgement and interpersonal attraction: a study of topic familiarity effect].[背景刺激人物对态度相似性判断和人际吸引力的对比效应:主题熟悉度效应研究]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2000 Oct;71(4):345-50. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.71.345.
8
Does familiarity breed contempt or liking? Comment on Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011).熟悉会滋生轻视还是喜欢?评论 Reis、Maniaci、Caprariello、Eastwick 和 Finkel(2011)的研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):571-4. doi: 10.1037/a0023202.
9
When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries.熟悉度何时促进而非破坏人际吸引?昔日对手提出的综合模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/1745691614561682.
10
Overcoming the self-promotion dilemma: interpersonal attraction and extra help as a consequence of who sings one's praises.克服自我推销困境:因谁称赞自己而产生的人际吸引力和额外帮助。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1362-74. doi: 10.1177/0146167206290337.

引用本文的文献

1
Does learning more about others impact liking them? Replication and extension Registered Report of Norton .'s (2007) lure of ambiguity.更多地了解他人会影响对他们的喜欢程度吗?诺顿(2007年)的《模糊性的诱惑》的复制与扩展注册报告
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 30;12(4):250441. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250441. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Six-decade research bias towards fancy and familiar bird species.对奇特且为人熟知的鸟类物种长达六十年的研究偏差。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2044):20242846. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2846. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Association of fear of childbirth and postpartum depression with perceived partner response during pregnancy.
分娩恐惧和产后抑郁与孕期伴侣感知反应的关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07332-6.
4
Relationship power attenuated the effects of gratitude on perceived partner responsiveness and satisfaction in romantic relationships.关系权力削弱了感激对浪漫关系中感知到的伴侣反应能力和满意度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 10;14(1):21090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71994-z.
5
Familiarity Determines Whether Accent Affects Attitudes and Behaviors of the Listener.熟悉程度决定口音是否会影响听众的态度和行为。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 22;14(6):430. doi: 10.3390/bs14060430.
6
Measuring the experience of social connection within specific social interactions: The Connection During Conversations Scale (CDCS).测量特定社交互动中社会联系的体验:对话期间的连接量表(CDCS)。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 18;19(1):e0286408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286408. eCollection 2024.
7
A Critical Review of the Literature Regarding the Selection of Long-Term Romantic Partners.关于选择长期浪漫伴侣的文献综述述评
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Oct;52(7):3025-3042. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02646-y. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
The effects of everyday-life social interactions on anxiety-related autonomic responses differ between men and women.日常生活中的社交互动对男女焦虑相关自主反应的影响不同。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 12;13(1):9498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36118-z.
9
The Effects of Social Presence and Familiarity on Children-Robot Interactions.社会存在感和熟悉度对儿童与机器人互动的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;23(9):4231. doi: 10.3390/s23094231.
10
Initial compatibility during a "Speed-Dating" test predicts postpairing affiliation in titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus).在“速配”测试中的初始兼容性可预测卷尾猴(Plecturocebus cupreus)配对后的关系。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Jul;85(7):e23496. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23496. Epub 2023 Apr 26.