• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用受试者内模式分类来理解工作记忆选择与维持的振荡机制中的寿命年龄差异。

Using within-subject pattern classification to understand lifespan age differences in oscillatory mechanisms of working memory selection and maintenance.

作者信息

Karch Julian D, Sander Myriam C, von Oertzen Timo, Brandmaier Andreas M, Werkle-Bergner Markus

机构信息

Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:538-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.038. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.038
PMID:25929619
Abstract

In lifespan studies, large within-group heterogeneity with regard to behavioral and neuronal data is observed. This casts doubt on the validity of group-statistics-based approaches to understand age-related changes on cognitive and neural levels. Recent progress in brain-computer interface research demonstrates the potential of machine learning techniques to derive reliable person-specific models, representing brain behavior mappings. The present study now proposes a supervised learning approach to derive person-specific models for the identification and quantification of interindividual differences in oscillatory EEG responses related to working memory selection and maintenance mechanisms in a heterogeneous lifespan sample. EEG data were used to discriminate different levels of working memory load and the focus of visual attention. We demonstrate that our approach leads to person-specific models with better discrimination performance compared to classical person-nonspecific models. We show how these models can be interpreted both on an individual as well as on a group level. One of the key findings is that, with regard to the time dimension, the between-person variance of the obtained person-specific models is smaller in older than in younger adults. This is contrary to what we expected because of increased behavioral and neuronal heterogeneity in older adults.

摘要

在寿命研究中,观察到行为和神经元数据在组内存在很大的异质性。这对基于组统计方法来理解认知和神经层面与年龄相关变化的有效性提出了质疑。脑机接口研究的最新进展表明,机器学习技术有潜力推导可靠的个人特定模型,以表示脑行为映射。本研究现提出一种监督学习方法,用于在异质寿命样本中推导个人特定模型,以识别和量化与工作记忆选择和维持机制相关的振荡脑电图反应中的个体差异。脑电图数据用于区分不同水平的工作记忆负荷和视觉注意力焦点。我们证明,与经典的非个人特定模型相比,我们的方法能产生具有更好区分性能的个人特定模型。我们展示了这些模型如何在个体和群体层面上进行解释。其中一个关键发现是,在时间维度上,与年轻人相比,老年人获得的个人特定模型的个体间差异较小。这与我们的预期相反,因为老年人的行为和神经元异质性增加。

相似文献

1
Using within-subject pattern classification to understand lifespan age differences in oscillatory mechanisms of working memory selection and maintenance.运用受试者内模式分类来理解工作记忆选择与维持的振荡机制中的寿命年龄差异。
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:538-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.038. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
Amplitude modulations and inter-trial phase stability of alpha-oscillations differentially reflect working memory constraints across the lifespan.alpha 振荡的幅度调制和跨生命周期试验间相位稳定性差异反映了工作记忆的限制。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.092. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
3
The impact of age on prefrontal cortex integrity during spatial working memory retrieval.年龄对空间工作记忆检索过程中前额叶皮质完整性的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 10.
4
Load modulation of BOLD response and connectivity predicts working memory performance in younger and older adults.脑血氧水平依赖信号的负载调节与连接预测年轻和老年成年人的工作记忆表现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):2030-45. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21560. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
5
Failure to engage spatial working memory contributes to age-related declines in visuomotor learning.未能参与空间工作记忆会导致与年龄相关的运动视觉学习能力下降。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):11-25. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21451.
6
Distinction between perceptual and attentional processing in working memory tasks: a study of phase-locked and induced oscillatory brain dynamics.工作记忆任务中感知与注意加工的区分:锁相和诱发振荡脑动力学研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):158-72. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.158.
7
Age-related differences in working memory evoked gamma oscillations.工作记忆诱发的伽马振荡中的年龄相关差异。
Brain Res. 2014 Aug 12;1576:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
8
Age differences in target detection and interference resolution in working memory: an event-related potential study.工作记忆中目标检测与干扰解决的年龄差异:一项事件相关电位研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2250-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20158.
9
Contralateral delay activity reveals life-span age differences in top-down modulation of working memory contents.对侧延迟活动揭示了工作记忆内容自上而下调制的寿命期年龄差异。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Dec;21(12):2809-19. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr076. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
10
Lifespan age differences in working memory: a two-component framework.工作记忆的寿命年龄差异:双成分框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Oct;36(9):2007-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroencephalography-Based Brain-Machine Interfaces in Older Adults: A Literature Review.老年人基于脑电图的脑机接口:文献综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;10(4):395. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040395.
2
Individualized Modeling to Distinguish Between High and Low Arousal States Using Physiological Data.使用生理数据进行个体化建模以区分高唤醒状态和低唤醒状态。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Jan 22;4(1):91-109. doi: 10.1007/s41666-019-00064-1. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Riemannian classification of single-trial surface EEG and sources during checkerboard and navigational images in humans.
人类在棋盘和导航图像刺激下单次头皮脑电和源的黎曼分类。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262417. eCollection 2022.
4
Predicting visual working memory with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.利用多模态磁共振成像预测视觉工作记忆。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Apr 1;42(5):1446-1462. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25305. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Gaussian Process Panel Modeling-Machine Learning Inspired Analysis of Longitudinal Panel Data.高斯过程面板建模——受机器学习启发的纵向面板数据分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 19;11:351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00351. eCollection 2020.
6
Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis.前额叶α波不对称性作为抑郁症的诊断标志物:事实还是虚构?一项荟萃分析。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jul 15;16:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.006. eCollection 2017.
7
Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data.弥合临床数据分析中通则法与个案法之间的差距。
Assessment. 2016 Aug;23(4):447-458. doi: 10.1177/1073191116648209.