Karch Julian D, Sander Myriam C, von Oertzen Timo, Brandmaier Andreas M, Werkle-Bergner Markus
Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:538-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.038. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
In lifespan studies, large within-group heterogeneity with regard to behavioral and neuronal data is observed. This casts doubt on the validity of group-statistics-based approaches to understand age-related changes on cognitive and neural levels. Recent progress in brain-computer interface research demonstrates the potential of machine learning techniques to derive reliable person-specific models, representing brain behavior mappings. The present study now proposes a supervised learning approach to derive person-specific models for the identification and quantification of interindividual differences in oscillatory EEG responses related to working memory selection and maintenance mechanisms in a heterogeneous lifespan sample. EEG data were used to discriminate different levels of working memory load and the focus of visual attention. We demonstrate that our approach leads to person-specific models with better discrimination performance compared to classical person-nonspecific models. We show how these models can be interpreted both on an individual as well as on a group level. One of the key findings is that, with regard to the time dimension, the between-person variance of the obtained person-specific models is smaller in older than in younger adults. This is contrary to what we expected because of increased behavioral and neuronal heterogeneity in older adults.
在寿命研究中,观察到行为和神经元数据在组内存在很大的异质性。这对基于组统计方法来理解认知和神经层面与年龄相关变化的有效性提出了质疑。脑机接口研究的最新进展表明,机器学习技术有潜力推导可靠的个人特定模型,以表示脑行为映射。本研究现提出一种监督学习方法,用于在异质寿命样本中推导个人特定模型,以识别和量化与工作记忆选择和维持机制相关的振荡脑电图反应中的个体差异。脑电图数据用于区分不同水平的工作记忆负荷和视觉注意力焦点。我们证明,与经典的非个人特定模型相比,我们的方法能产生具有更好区分性能的个人特定模型。我们展示了这些模型如何在个体和群体层面上进行解释。其中一个关键发现是,在时间维度上,与年轻人相比,老年人获得的个人特定模型的个体间差异较小。这与我们的预期相反,因为老年人的行为和神经元异质性增加。