• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险:一项符合PRISMA标准的前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析

Fruits and vegetables intake and risk of bladder cancer: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

作者信息

Xu Chang, Zeng Xian-Tao, Liu Tong-Zu, Zhang Chao, Yang Zhong-Hua, Li Sheng, Chen Xiao-Yan

机构信息

From the Department of Urology (CX, T-ZL, Z-HY, SL, X-YC); Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital (CX, X-TZ, T-ZL, CZ, SL); and Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan University, Wuhan, PR China (X-TZ, SL).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(17):e759. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000759.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000000759
PMID:25929912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4603065/
Abstract

Clinical practice recommends eating ≥2.5 cups of fruits and vegetables (FVs) each day for cancer prevention, in which the evidence from epidemiological studies for the association between FVs intake and bladder cancer (BC) prevention is inconsistent.We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Willy online Library for relevant studies published up to September 27, 2014. Prospective cohort studies investigated FVs intake, and the risk of BC with ≥3 categories of exposure was included. A dose-response meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the association between FVs intake and risk of BC.Fourteen cohorts with 17 studies including 9447 cases were identified. No evidence of nonlinear association was examined between FVs intake and risk of BC. The summarized relevant risk (RR) of every 0.2 serving increment a day was 1.00 (95%CI: 0.99, 1.00; P = 0.17; I = 41.7%; n = 14) for total fruits; 0.99 (95%CI: 0.96, 1.01; P = 0.28; I = 37.0%; n = 13) for total vegetables; and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.97, 1.01; P = 0.24; I = 57.5%; n = 8) for both FVs. In further analysis, we observed inverse association between every 0.2 serving increment of green leafy vegetables intake a day and risk of BC (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96, 0.99; I = 0.0%; P < 0.01; Power = 0.76; n = 6), but neither for cruciferous vegetables (RR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.93, 1.01; P = 0.19; I = 55.8%; n = 8) nor for citrus (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.00; P = 0.83; I = 0.0%; n = 7). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results.Little evidence supports a beneficial effect for total fruits, vegetables, both FVs, and citrus intake against bladder cancer. Green leafy vegetables may help prevent bladder cancer.

摘要

临床实践建议每天食用≥2.5杯水果和蔬菜以预防癌症,然而,关于水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌预防之间关联的流行病学研究证据并不一致。我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Willy在线图书馆,查找截至2014年9月27日发表的相关研究。纳入前瞻性队列研究,这些研究调查了水果和蔬菜摄入量,且暴露水平有≥3个类别,同时纳入了膀胱癌风险。进行剂量反应荟萃分析以评估水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险之间的关联。

共识别出14个队列,包含17项研究,涉及9447例病例。未发现水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险之间存在非线性关联的证据。每天每增加0.2份水果的汇总相对风险(RR)为1.00(95%置信区间:0.99,1.00;P = 0.17;I² = 41.7%;n = 14);每天每增加0.2份蔬菜的RR为0.99(95%置信区间:0.96,1.01;P = 0.28;I² = 37.0%;n = 13);每天每增加0.2份水果和蔬菜的RR为0.99(95%置信区间:0.97,1.01;P = 0.24;I² = 57.5%;n = 8)。在进一步分析中,我们观察到每天绿叶蔬菜摄入量每增加0.2份与膀胱癌风险呈负相关(RR = 0.98,95%置信区间:0.96,0.99;I² = 0.0%;P < 0.01;检验效能 = 0.76;n = 6),但十字花科蔬菜(RR = 0.97,95%置信区间:0.93,1.01;P = 0.19;I² = 55.8%;n = 8)和柑橘类水果(RR = 1.00,95%置信区间:1.00,1.00;P = 0.83;I² = 0.0%;n = 7)均未显示出这种关联。亚组分析显示结果一致。

几乎没有证据支持水果、蔬菜、水果和蔬菜整体以及柑橘类水果摄入量对预防膀胱癌有有益作用。绿叶蔬菜可能有助于预防膀胱癌。

相似文献

1
Fruits and vegetables intake and risk of bladder cancer: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险:一项符合PRISMA标准的前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(17):e759. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000759.
2
Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水果、蔬菜与膀胱癌风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancer Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):136-46. doi: 10.1002/cam4.327. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与心血管疾病、总癌症和全因死亡率的风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):1029-1056. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319.
4
Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of frailty: A systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.水果和蔬菜摄入量与虚弱风险:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Nov;71:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101460. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水果、蔬菜与肺癌风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):81-96. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv381. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.在幼儿教育和照护环境中实施的健康饮食干预措施,以改善 6 个月至 6 岁儿童的饮食。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 22;8(8):CD013862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013862.pub3.
7
Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Relation to Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与肺癌风险的关系:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jun 30;30(2):75-88. doi: 10.15430/JCP.25.009.
8
Selenium for preventing cancer.硒预防癌症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD005195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005195.pub4.
9
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
10
Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.水果和蔬菜的消费与高血压风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Aug;62(5):1941-1955. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03145-5. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Black rice bran‑derived anthocyanins attenuate cholangiocarcinoma cell migration via the alteration of epithelial‑mesenchymal transition and sialylation.黑米麸皮衍生的花青素通过改变上皮-间质转化和唾液酸化来减弱胆管癌细胞的迁移。
Biomed Rep. 2024 Dec 6;22(2):28. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1906. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Mini nutritional assessment as a screening tool for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: A cross-sectional study in a high-volume center.微型营养评定法作为肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的筛查工具:一项在大型中心开展的横断面研究。
Bladder (San Franc). 2024 Sep 5;11(1):e21200002. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0006. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of bladder cancer: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险:观察性研究的最新荟萃分析
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015 Nov;24(6):508-16. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000119.
2
Fruits, vegetables, and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水果、蔬菜与膀胱癌风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancer Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):136-46. doi: 10.1002/cam4.327. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
Nonlinear reduction in risk for colorectal cancer by oral contraceptive use: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
Fruits and vegetables intake and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis from 11 case-control studies in the BLadder cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) consortium.
水果和蔬菜摄入量与膀胱癌风险:BLadder cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) 联盟中 11 项病例对照研究的汇总分析。
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Oct;63(7):2477-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03436-5. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
4
The association between sleep duration and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.睡眠时间与肺癌的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Sleep Breath. 2024 Mar;28(1):519-530. doi: 10.1007/s11325-023-02917-x. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Relationship between Bladder Cancer, Nutritional Supply, and Treatment Strategies: A Comprehensive Review.膀胱癌、营养供应与治疗策略的关系:全面综述。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 31;15(17):3812. doi: 10.3390/nu15173812.
6
Food groups and urologic cancers risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.食物类别与泌尿系统癌症风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2023 May 17;10:1154996. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1154996. eCollection 2023.
7
Interplay between Cruciferous Vegetables and the Gut Microbiome: A Multi-Omic Approach.十字花科蔬菜与肠道微生物组的相互作用:多组学方法。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 22;15(1):42. doi: 10.3390/nu15010042.
8
The Role of NMP22 and CSTB Levels in Predicting Postoperative Recurrence of Bladder Cancer.NMP22 和 CSTB 水平在预测膀胱癌术后复发中的作用。
J Immunol Res. 2022 May 19;2022:6735310. doi: 10.1155/2022/6735310. eCollection 2022.
9
Tooth Loss and the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.牙齿缺失与缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 14;2022:1088371. doi: 10.1155/2022/1088371. eCollection 2022.
10
Diet Quality and Survival in a Population-Based Bladder Cancer Study.基于人群的膀胱癌研究中的饮食质量与生存。
Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(7):2400-2411. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2021.2008989. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
口服避孕药使用对结直肠癌风险的非线性降低作用:一项流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Jan;26(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0483-2. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
4
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.水果和蔬菜的摄入量与膀胱癌风险:观察性研究的剂量反应荟萃分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2014 Dec;25(12):1645-58. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0469-0. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
5
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Association between the HSPA1B ±1267A/G polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 14 case-control studies.HSPA1B基因±1267A/G多态性与癌症风险的关联:14项病例对照研究的荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(16):6855-61. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.16.6855.
7
Prediction of heart rate variability on cardiac sudden death in heart failure patients: a systematic review.心力衰竭患者心脏性猝死的心率变异性预测:一项系统评价
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;174(3):857-860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.176. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
8
Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.母体体重指数与胎儿死亡、死产和婴儿死亡风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 16;311(15):1536-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269.
9
Parity and pancreatic cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.生育状况与胰腺癌风险:流行病学研究的剂量反应荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092738. eCollection 2014.
10
How to use a subgroup analysis: users' guide to the medical literature.如何进行亚组分析:医学文献使用指南。
JAMA. 2014;311(4):405-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285063.