Suzuki Terumi
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Tokyo Health Science, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):967-71. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.967. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliabilities of measurements of knee extensor muscle strength using a pull-type hand-held dynamometer (HHD). [Subjects] Fifty-four healthy adults (35 males; average age, 23 years) participated in this study. [Methods] Knee extensor muscle strength of each leg was measured three times using the HHD. To examine the intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities, measurements were performed by two examiners, a physical therapist and a physical therapy student. [Results] The intra-examiner reliabilities, ICC (1, 1) and ICC (1, 3) ranged from 0.94-0.99. The inter-examiner reliabilities, ICC (2, 1) and ICC (3, 1) ranged from 0.90-0.92 for the right leg, and 0.88-0.90 for the left leg. Neither constant nor proportional errors were found by Bland-Altman analysis. [Conclusion] Intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliabilities were acceptable, indicating that muscle strength can be measured with the pull-type HHD without dependence on skill of measurement. Pain was not caused by measurements with the pull-type HHD.
[目的]本研究旨在探讨使用拉力型手持式测力计(HHD)测量膝伸肌肌力时检查者内和检查者间的可靠性。[对象]54名健康成年人(35名男性;平均年龄23岁)参与了本研究。[方法]使用HHD对每条腿的膝伸肌肌力进行3次测量。为了检查检查者内和检查者间的可靠性,由一名物理治疗师和一名物理治疗专业学生两名检查者进行测量。[结果]检查者内可靠性,组内相关系数(ICC)(1,1)和ICC(1,3)范围为0.94 - 0.99。检查者间可靠性,右腿的ICC(2,1)和ICC(3,1)范围为0.90 - 0.92,左腿为0.88 - 0.90。Bland-Altman分析未发现恒定误差和比例误差。[结论]检查者内和检查者间可靠性均可接受,表明使用拉力型HHD测量肌力无需依赖测量技巧。拉力型HHD测量未引起疼痛。