Zhang Jieting, Lanza Stephanie, Zhang Minqiang, Su Binyuan
1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application & School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Normal College, Shenzhen University.
2 The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University.
Psychol Rep. 2015 Jun;116(3):821-39. doi: 10.2466/08.02.PR0.116k26w3. Epub 2015 May 1.
The University Personality Inventory, a mental health instrument for college students, is frequently used for screening in China. However, its unidimensionality has been questioned. This study examined its dimensions to provide more information about the specific mental problems for students at risk. Four subsamples were randomly created from a sample (N = 6,110; M age = 19.1 yr.) of students at a university in China. Principal component analysis with Promax rotation was applied on the first two subsamples to explore dimension of the inventory. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the third subsample to verify the exploratory dimensions. Finally, the identified factors were compared to the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) to support validity, and sex differences were examined, based on the fourth subsample. Five factors were identified: Physical Symptoms, Cognitive Symptoms, Emotional Vulnerability, Social Avoidance, and Interpersonal Sensitivity, accounting for 60.3% of the variance. All the five factors were significantly correlated with the SCL-90. Women scored significantly higher than men on Cognitive Symptoms and Interpersonal Sensitivity.
大学生人格问卷是一种针对大学生的心理健康测评工具,在中国常被用于筛查。然而,其单一维度性受到了质疑。本研究对其维度进行了考察,以提供更多关于有风险学生具体心理问题的信息。从中国一所大学的学生样本(N = 6110;平均年龄 = 19.1岁)中随机抽取了四个子样本。对前两个子样本进行了采用斜交旋转的主成分分析,以探索该问卷的维度。对第三个子样本进行了验证性因素分析,以验证探索出的维度。最后,将识别出的因素与症状自评量表90(SCL - 90)进行比较以支持效度,并基于第四个子样本考察了性别差异。识别出了五个因素:身体症状、认知症状、情绪易感性、社交回避和人际敏感性,它们解释了60.3%的方差变异。所有这五个因素均与SCL - 90显著相关。在认知症状和人际敏感性方面,女性得分显著高于男性。