Sun Wenze, Wang Tao, Shi Fan, Wang Jiquan, Wang Juan, Hui Beina, Zhang Yingbing, Lu Jinli, Chen Hongwei, Liu Zi
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Yanta District, Xi'an, 710061, China.
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 4;15:353. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1355-1.
In cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors, the optimal adjuvant therapy is still controversial. We undertook a randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01418859) to compare the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with topotecan and cisplatin with radiotherapy alone in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms including arm A (radiotherapy only,RT), arm B(concurrent chemoradiotherapy only, CCRT), and arm C (concurrent chemoradiotherapy with following consolidation chemotherapy, CCRT + CT). All eligible patients completed external RT (IMRT or 3D-CRT), receiving 45-50 Gy /25 f uniformly to the pelvis. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen was topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) for days 1, 2 and 3, followed by cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) for days 1, 2 and 3. Three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy regimen was topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) for days 1 and 2, and 0.75 mg/m(2) for day 3; followed by cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) for days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 21 days. Adverse events of each group were investigated and compared.
Thirty-nine patients enrolled onto the remaining regimens: 14 to RT, 15 to CCRT and 10 to CCRT + CT. Six patients (15.4%) did not complete the protocol treatment. Hematologic toxicity was more frequent and more severe in the CCRT and CCRT + CT arms compared with the RT arm. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly different statistically between the RT, CCRT and CCRT + RT groups (15.4%, 46.7% and 100%, respectively; P = 0.002). Specially, three patients in CCRT + CT arm of all six patients who did not complete the protocol treatment discontinued planned therapy because of persistent grade 4 neutropenia. However, there were no significant differences in grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities between the three groups(all P > 0.05). Recurrence-free survival and overall survival of each group were not analyzed on account of a median follow-up of only 16 months.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with topotecan and cisplatin showed severe hematologic toxicity in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy. Thus, the study was closed ahead of schedule.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01418859 .
在具有中度风险因素的宫颈癌患者中,最佳辅助治疗方案仍存在争议。我们开展了一项随机试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01418859),以比较拓扑替康和顺铂同步放化疗与单纯放疗在中度风险宫颈癌患者中的疗效和毒性。
符合条件的患者被随机分配到三个治疗组之一,包括A组(单纯放疗,RT)、B组(单纯同步放化疗,CCRT)和C组(同步放化疗后巩固化疗,CCRT+CT)。所有符合条件的患者均完成了体外放疗(调强放疗或三维适形放疗),盆腔均匀接受45 - 50 Gy / 25次分割照射。同步化疗方案为第1、2、3天给予拓扑替康0.75 mg/m²,随后第1、2、3天给予顺铂25 mg/m²。巩固化疗方案为第1、2天给予拓扑替康1.5 mg/m²,第3天给予0.75 mg/m²;随后第1、2、3天给予顺铂25 mg/m²,每21天重复一次。对每组的不良事件进行调查和比较。
39例患者纳入其余治疗方案:14例接受RT,15例接受CCRT,10例接受CCRT+CT。6例患者(15.4%)未完成方案治疗。与RT组相比,CCRT组和CCRT+CT组的血液学毒性更频繁且更严重。RT组、CCRT组和CCRT+RT组3 - 4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率在统计学上有显著差异(分别为15.4%、46.7%和100%;P = 0.002)。特别地,在未完成方案治疗的所有6例患者中,CCRT+CT组有3例患者因持续的4级中性粒细胞减少症而停止了计划治疗。然而,三组之间3 - 4级非血液学毒性无显著差异(所有P > 0.05)。由于中位随访时间仅16个月,未对每组的无复发生存率和总生存率进行分析。
在根治性子宫切除术后的中度风险宫颈癌患者中,拓扑替康和顺铂同步放化疗显示出严重的血液学毒性。因此,该研究提前结束。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01418859 。