Büchel Kerstin, Bendin Juliane, Gharbi Amina, Rahlenbeck Sibylle, Dautel Hans
IS Insect Services GmbH, Haderslebener Str. 9, 12163 Berlin, Germany.
Umweltbundesamt, P.O. Box 33 00 22, 14191 Berlin, Germany.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015 Jun;6(4):494-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Repellent efficacy of 10% EBAAP (3-[N-butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester) and 10% Icaridin ((2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 1-methylpropyl ester)) were evaluated against 20% DEET (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) in human subject trials against ticks. Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the European castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus L.; Acari: Ixodidae) and the North American blacklegged tick (I. scapularis Say; Acari: Ixodidae) were compared. Tests were carried out according to the US-EPA standard protocol with ethanolic solutions of the active ingredients of repellents being applied to the forearm of 10 volunteers. The upward movement of ticks was monitored until repellent failure taking up to 12.5 h. Application of 20% DEET resulted in median complete protection times (CPT; Kaplan-Meier median) between 4 and 4.5 h, while 10% EBAAP yielded CPTs of 3.5-4h. No significant differences were found between the efficacies of two repellents nor between the two species tested. The median of the CPT of a 10% Icaridin solution was 5h in nymphs of I. scapularis, but 8h in those of I. ricinus (P<0.01). Based on these studies, EBAAP and Icaridin are efficacious alternatives to DEET in their repellent activity against nymphs of the two Ixodes ticks with Icaridin demonstrating particularly promising results against I. ricinus. Future research should investigate whether similar results occur when adult Ixodes ticks or other tick species are tested.
在人体蜱虫防治试验中,评估了10%的EBAAP(3-[N-丁基-N-乙酰基]-氨基丙酸乙酯)和10%的驱蚊酯(2-(2-羟乙基)-1-哌啶羧酸1-甲基丙酯)相对于20%避蚊胺(N,N-二乙基-3-甲基苯甲酰胺)的驱避效果。比较了欧洲蓖麻蜱(蓖麻硬蜱;蜱螨目:硬蜱科)和北美黑腿蜱(肩突硬蜱;蜱螨目:硬蜱科)若虫寻找宿主的反应。按照美国环境保护局的标准方案进行测试,将驱避剂活性成分的乙醇溶液涂抹在10名志愿者的前臂上。监测蜱虫向上移动的情况,直至驱避失效,最长持续12.5小时。涂抹20%避蚊胺后的中位完全保护时间(CPT;Kaplan-Meier中位数)在4至4.5小时之间,而10%的EBAAP产生的CPT为3.5 - 4小时。两种驱避剂的效果之间以及所测试的两个物种之间均未发现显著差异。10%驱蚊酯溶液在肩突硬蜱若虫中的CPT中位数为5小时,但在蓖麻硬蜱若虫中为8小时(P<0.01)。基于这些研究,EBAAP和驱蚊酯在对这两种硬蜱若虫的驱避活性方面是避蚊胺的有效替代品,其中驱蚊酯对蓖麻硬蜱显示出特别有前景的结果。未来的研究应调查在测试成年硬蜱或其他蜱种时是否会出现类似结果。