避蚊胺对不同实验室生物测定条件下的卡延花蜱若虫(蜱螨亚纲:硬蜱科)的驱避活性。
Repellent activity of DEET against Amblyomma cajennense (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs submitted to different laboratory bioassays.
作者信息
Soares Sara Fernandes, Braga Raquel de Sousa, Ferreira Lorena Lopes, Louly Carla Cristina Braz, de Sousa Lorena Alessandra Dias, da Silva Andrea Caetano, Borges Lígia Miranda Ferreira
机构信息
Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Goiás-UFG Rua Antônio Cupertino de Barros, Qd. 11, Lt 06, Setor Criméia Leste, Goiânia-GO, Brazil.
出版信息
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):12-6.
This study was developed to evaluate the repellent activity of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) against Amblyomma cajennense nymphs. Two repellent bioassays were compared and the effective concentration and repellent time were calculated. The fingertip test was accomplished to evaluate in vivo four concentrations of the compound (0.200; 0.100; 0.050 and 0.025 mg.cm⁻²) and the filter-paper bioassay to evaluate in vitro the two highest concentrations.The compound provided repellence higher than 90% in all concentrations and at least 95% repellency in the highest concentration over 5 hours. The effective concentration against 50% of tested nymphs (EC50) was 0.006 mg.cm⁻² and the EC99 was 0.036 mg.cm⁻². Those concentrations were lower than the ones obtained against other tick species, denoting the effectiveness of DEET against A. cajennense. The repellency time against 50% of the ticks (RT50) was 4.8 hours and the RT90 was 2.7 hours. Both bioassays were adequate to evaluate A. cajennense repellency and provided similar results; however the in vivo test is more appropriate to estimate the effective concentration and repellency time.
本研究旨在评估N,N-二乙基-3-甲基苯甲酰胺(避蚊胺)对卡延花蜱若虫的驱避活性。比较了两种驱避生物测定法,并计算了有效浓度和驱避时间。进行指尖试验以评估该化合物的四种浓度(0.200;0.100;0.050和0.025 mg·cm⁻²)在体内的效果,并用滤纸生物测定法在体外评估两种最高浓度的效果。该化合物在所有浓度下的驱避率均高于90%,在最高浓度下5小时内的驱避率至少为95%。对50%受试若虫的有效浓度(EC50)为0.006 mg·cm⁻²,EC99为0.036 mg·cm⁻²。这些浓度低于针对其他蜱种所获得的浓度,表明避蚊胺对卡延花蜱有效。对50%蜱虫的驱避时间(RT50)为4.8小时,RT90为2.7小时。两种生物测定法都足以评估卡延花蜱的驱避性,并提供了相似的结果;然而,体内试验更适合估计有效浓度和驱避时间。