Suppr超能文献

多重 PCR 检测结核分枝杆菌耐药性的诊断准确性研究。

Diagnostic accuracy study of multiplex PCR for detecting tuberculosis drug resistance.

机构信息

Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera del Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis Hospital, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Infect. 2015 Aug;71(2):220-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the diagnostic accuracy of a multiplex real-time PCR (Anyplex II MTB/MDR/XDR, Seegene, Corea) that detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), fluoroquinolones (FLQ) and injectable drugs (kanamycin [KAN], amikacin [AMK] and capreomycin [CAP]) in isolates and specimens.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen cultured isolates and 73 sputum specimens were retrospectively selected. Results obtained with multiplex PCR were compared with those obtained with BACTEC. Discordant results between multiplex PCR and BACTEC were tested by alternative molecular methods.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of multiplex PCR for detecting drug resistance in isolates were 76.5% and 100%, respectively, for INH; 97.2% and 96.0%, respectively, for RIF; 70.4% and 87.9%, respectively, for FLQ; 81.5% and 84.8%, respectively, for KAN; 100% and 60%, respectively, for AMK, and 100% and 72.3%, respectively, for CAP. Sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex for detecting drug resistance in specimens were 93.3% and 100%, respectively, for INH; 100% and 100%, respectively, for RIF; 50.0% and 100%, respectively, for FLQ; and 100% and 94.4%, respectively, for both KAN and CAP. Among the discordant results, 87.7% (71/81) of results obtained with the multiplex PCR were concordant with at least one of the alternative molecular methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This multiplex PCR may be a useful tool for the rapid identification of drug resistant tuberculosis in isolates and specimens, thus allowing an initial therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, for a correct management of patients, results should be confirmed by a phenotypic method.

摘要

目的

研究一种检测结核分枝杆菌对异烟肼(INH)、利福平(RIF)、氟喹诺酮类药物(FLQ)和注射用药物(卡那霉素[KAN]、阿米卡星[AMK]和卷曲霉素[CAP])耐药性的多重实时 PCR(Anyplex II MTB/MDR/XDR,Seegene,韩国)在分离株和标本中的诊断准确性。

方法

回顾性选择 114 株培养分离株和 73 份痰标本。将多重 PCR 结果与 BACTEC 结果进行比较。对多重 PCR 与 BACTEC 结果不一致的标本,采用替代分子方法进行检测。

结果

多重 PCR 检测分离株耐药的敏感性和特异性分别为 INH 76.5%和 100%,RIF 97.2%和 96.0%,FLQ 70.4%和 87.9%,KAN 81.5%和 84.8%,AMK 100%和 60%,CAP 100%和 72.3%。Anyplex 检测标本耐药的敏感性和特异性分别为 INH 93.3%和 100%,RIF 100%和 100%,FLQ 50.0%和 100%,KAN 和 CAP 100%和 94.4%。在不一致的结果中,87.7%(71/81)的多重 PCR 结果与至少一种替代分子方法一致。

结论

该多重 PCR 可快速鉴定分离株和标本中的耐药结核分枝杆菌,从而为初始治疗提供依据。然而,为了正确管理患者,结果应通过表型方法确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验