• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Insurers' Negotiating Leverage and the External Effects of Medicare Part D.保险公司的谈判杠杆作用与医疗保险D部分的外部效应。
Rev Econ Stat. 2015 May 1;97(2):314-331. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00463.
2
Market Share Matters: Evidence Of Insurer And Provider Bargaining Over Prices.市场份额至关重要:保险公司与医疗服务提供商就价格进行讨价还价的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):141-148. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0479.
3
Market Power: Price Variation Among Commercial Insurers For Hospital Services.市场势力:商业保险公司之间医院服务价格的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Oct;37(10):1615-1622. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0567.
4
How do health insurer market concentration and bargaining power with hospitals affect health insurance premiums?健康保险公司的市场集中度以及与医院的议价能力如何影响医疗保险费用?
J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;42:104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
How insurers' bargaining power affects drug prices in Medicare Part D.保险公司的议价能力如何影响医疗保险D部分的药品价格。
Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health. 2009(4):1-2.
6
Prices and market power in mental health care: Evidence from a major policy change in the Netherlands.精神卫生保健中的价格和市场势力:来自荷兰重大政策变革的证据。
Health Econ. 2021 Apr;30(4):803-819. doi: 10.1002/hec.4222. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Hospital Prices For Commercial Plans Are Twice Those For Medicare Advantage Plans When Negotiated By The Same Insurer.同一家保险公司协商时,商业计划的医院价格是医疗保险优势计划的两倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Aug;42(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00039.
8
The Big Five Health Insurers' Membership And Revenue Trends: Implications For Public Policy.五大健康保险公司的会员和收入趋势:对公共政策的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2185-2194. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0858.
9
Do Insurers With Greater Market Power Negotiate Consistently Lower Prices for Hospital Care? Evidence From Hospital Price Transparency Data.保险公司的市场势力越大,是否会一直协商降低医院护理的价格?来自医院价格透明度数据的证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Feb;81(1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/10775587231193475. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Equilibrium Provider Networks: Bargaining and Exclusion in Health Care Markets.均衡供应商网络:医疗市场的谈判与排斥
Am Econ Rev. 2019 Feb;109(2):473-522.

引用本文的文献

1
The complexity of pharmaceutical expenditures across U.S. states.美国各州药品支出的复杂性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01885-4.
2
Trends in Integration Between Physician Organizations and Pharmacies for Self-Administered Drugs.医生组织与药店在自行管理药物方面的整合趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356592. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56592.
3
Prescription Drug Advertising and Drug Utilization: The Role of Medicare Part D.处方药广告与药物利用:医疗保险D部分的作用
J Public Econ. 2023 May;221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104860. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
4
Association of Drug Rebates and Competition With Out-of-Pocket Coinsurance in Medicare Part D, 2014 to 2018.2014 年至 2018 年期间,医疗保险处方药部分的药品回扣和竞争与自付共付额的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219030. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9030.
5
The economics of alternative payment models for pharmaceuticals.药品替代支付模式的经济学。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):559-569. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01274-4. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Health Insurance Markets Competitive?医疗保险市场具有竞争力吗?
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Sep;100(4):1399-431. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1399.
2
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization.医疗保险处方药计划(Medicare Part D)对药品价格和使用的影响。
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar;100(1):590-607. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.590.
3
Insurer-Provider Networks in the Medical Care Market.医疗保健市场中的保险公司-供应商网络。
Am Econ Rev. 2009 Mar;99(1):393-430. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.1.393.
4
Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.比较摩擦:来自医疗保险药品计划的实验证据。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):199-235. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr055.
5
Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.老年人的选择不一致性:来自医疗保险处方药计划中计划选择的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Jun 1;101(4):1180-1210. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1180.
6
Medicare Part D's effects on elderly patients' drug costs and utilization.医疗保险D部分对老年患者药品费用和使用情况的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Nov;14(11 Suppl):SP14-22.
7
Should drug prices be negotiated under part D of Medicare? And if so, how?医疗保险D部分下的药品价格应该进行谈判吗?如果应该,该如何进行谈判?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.33.
8
The effect of the Medicare Part D prescription benefit on drug utilization and expenditures.医疗保险D部分处方药福利对药物使用和支出的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):169-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00200. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
9
The impact of Medicare Part D on prescription drug use by the elderly.医疗保险D部分对老年人处方药使用的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1735-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1735.
10
The impact of the tax system on health insurance coverage.税收制度对医疗保险覆盖范围的影响。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Sep-Dec;1(3-4):293-304. doi: 10.1023/a:1013719702921.

保险公司的谈判杠杆作用与医疗保险D部分的外部效应。

Insurers' Negotiating Leverage and the External Effects of Medicare Part D.

作者信息

Lakdawalla Darius, Yin Wesley

机构信息

University of Southern California and NBER.

Boston University and NBER.

出版信息

Rev Econ Stat. 2015 May 1;97(2):314-331. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00463.

DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00463
PMID:25937676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4414344/
Abstract

By influencing the size and bargaining power of private insurers, public subsidization of private health insurance may project effects beyond the subsidized population. We test for such spillovers by analyzing how increases in insurer size resulting from the implementation of Medicare Part D affected drug prices negotiated in the non-Medicare commercial market. On average, Part D lowered prices for commercial enrollees by 3.7%. The external commercial market savings amount to $1.5 billion per year, which, if passed to consumers, approximates the internal cost-savings of newly-insured subsidized beneficiaries. If retained by insurers, it corresponds to a 5% average increase in profitability.

摘要

通过影响私人保险公司的规模和议价能力,对私人医疗保险的公共补贴可能会产生超出补贴人群的影响。我们通过分析医疗保险D部分的实施导致的保险公司规模增加如何影响非医疗保险商业市场中谈判的药品价格,来测试这种溢出效应。平均而言,D部分使商业参保者的药品价格降低了3.7%。外部商业市场每年节省15亿美元,如果将这笔节省传递给消费者,大致相当于新参保补贴受益人的内部成本节省。如果由保险公司保留,这相当于盈利能力平均提高5%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/d592824f4f30/nihms554423f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/54b1769e3d6d/nihms554423f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/d38dc6e235f3/nihms554423f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/63abaaff53d7/nihms554423f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/69baf34334e9/nihms554423f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/9b0a7234b185/nihms554423f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/d592824f4f30/nihms554423f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/54b1769e3d6d/nihms554423f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/d38dc6e235f3/nihms554423f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/63abaaff53d7/nihms554423f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/69baf34334e9/nihms554423f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/9b0a7234b185/nihms554423f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f821/4414344/d592824f4f30/nihms554423f6.jpg