Estabrook Ryne, Sadler Michael E, McGue Matt
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University.
Department of Psychology and Counseling, Gannon University.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1219-33. doi: 10.1037/pas0000114. Epub 2015 May 4.
A long-standing and critical problem in the study of aging and depression is the comparability of measurement across age groups. While psychological measures of depression typically show increased incidence of symptoms with increasing age, rates of depression diagnosis do not show the same age trend. This analysis presents tests of differential item functioning on the depression section of the CAMDEX interview schedule, using factor analysis-derived affective and somatic subscales (McGue & Christensen, 1997). Results for the affective subscale show significant differences in item functioning in the majority of the affective items as a function of age (items "Happy Life," "Lonely," "Nervous" "Worthless," and "Future": χ6(2) = [30.193, 255.971] across items, all p < .0001). Analyses for the somatic subscale show differential item functioning is limited to a single item relating to coping (χ6(2) = 180.754, p < .0001). These results indicate that differences in depression symptoms across age groups are not entirely consistent with a unidimensional depression trait, and that the measurement structure of depression varies over the life span.
衰老与抑郁研究中一个长期存在的关键问题是不同年龄组测量结果的可比性。虽然抑郁的心理测量通常显示症状发生率随年龄增长而增加,但抑郁诊断率并未呈现相同的年龄趋势。本分析使用因子分析得出的情感和躯体分量表(McGue & Christensen,1997),对CAMDEX访谈量表抑郁部分的项目功能差异进行了测试。情感分量表的结果显示,大多数情感项目的项目功能因年龄而异(项目“幸福生活”“孤独”“紧张”“无价值”和“未来”:各项目χ6(2)=[30.193, 255.971],所有p<.0001)。躯体分量表的分析表明,项目功能差异仅限于与应对相关的一个项目(χ6(2)=180.754,p<.0001)。这些结果表明,不同年龄组抑郁症状的差异并不完全符合单一维度的抑郁特质,且抑郁的测量结构在整个生命过程中有所变化。