• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母与学生联合预防酒精项目对中间因素和青少年饮酒行为的影响:一个序列中介模型。

Effects of a combined parent-student alcohol prevention program on intermediate factors and adolescents' drinking behavior: A sequential mediation model.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University.

Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):719-27. doi: 10.1037/a0039197. Epub 2015 May 4.

DOI:10.1037/a0039197
PMID:25939019
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous work revealed that the combined parent-student alcohol prevention program (PAS) effectively postponed alcohol initiation through its hypothesized intermediate factors: increase in strict parental rule setting and adolescents' self-control (Koning, van den Eijnden, Verdurmen, Engels, & Vollebergh, 2011). This study examines whether the parental strictness precedes an increase in adolescents' self-control by testing a sequential mediation model.

METHODS

A cluster randomized trial including 3,245 Dutch early adolescents (M age = 12.68, SD = 0.50) and their parents randomized over 4 conditions: (1) parent intervention, (2) student intervention, (3) combined intervention, and (4) control group. Outcome measure was amount of weekly drinking measured at age 12 to 15; baseline assessment (T0) and 3 follow-up assessments (T1-T3).

RESULTS

Main effects of the combined and parent intervention on weekly drinking at T3 were found. The effect of the combined intervention on weekly drinking (T3) was mediated via an increase in strict rule setting (T1) and adolescents' subsequent self-control (T2). In addition, the indirect effect of the combined intervention via rule setting (T1) was significant. No reciprocal sequential mediation (self-control at T1 prior to rules at T2) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study is 1 of the few studies reporting sequential mediation effects of youth intervention outcomes. It underscores the need of involving parents in youth alcohol prevention programs, and the need to target both parents and adolescents, so that change in parents' behavior enables change in their offspring.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,综合家长-学生酒精预防计划(PAS)通过其假设的中间因素有效地推迟了青少年的酒精初吸:增加严格的父母规则制定和青少年的自我控制(Koning、van den Eijnden、Verdurmen、Engels 和 Vollebergh,2011)。本研究通过测试顺序中介模型,检验了父母的严格程度是否先于青少年自我控制的增加。

方法

一项包括 3245 名荷兰早期青少年(M 年龄=12.68,SD=0.50)及其父母的聚类随机试验,将其随机分为 4 个条件:(1)家长干预,(2)学生干预,(3)综合干预,(4)对照组。因变量为 12 至 15 岁期间每周饮酒量的测量;基线评估(T0)和 3 次随访评估(T1-T3)。

结果

发现综合和家长干预对 T3 时每周饮酒量有主要影响。综合干预对每周饮酒量(T3)的影响通过严格规则制定(T1)和青少年随后的自我控制(T2)的增加来介导。此外,通过规则制定(T1)的综合干预的间接效应是显著的。没有发现自我控制(T1)先于规则(T2)的反向顺序中介作用。

结论

本研究是少数报告青年干预结果的顺序中介效应的研究之一。它强调了需要让父母参与青少年酒精预防计划,并需要同时针对父母和青少年,以便父母行为的改变能够使他们的子女发生改变。

相似文献

1
Effects of a combined parent-student alcohol prevention program on intermediate factors and adolescents' drinking behavior: A sequential mediation model.父母与学生联合预防酒精项目对中间因素和青少年饮酒行为的影响:一个序列中介模型。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):719-27. doi: 10.1037/a0039197. Epub 2015 May 4.
2
The Outcomes of an Alcohol Prevention Program on Parents' Rule Setting and Self-efficacy: a Bidirectional Model.一项关于父母规则设定和自我效能的酒精预防计划的结果:一个双向模型。
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0625-0.
3
Differential effects of baseline drinking status: effects of an alcohol prevention program targeting students and/or parents (PAS) among weekly drinking students.基线饮酒状况的差异影响:针对学生和/或家长的酒精预防计划(PAS)对每周饮酒学生的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Apr;46(4):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
A cluster randomized trial on the effects of a parent and student intervention on alcohol use in adolescents four years after baseline; no evidence of catching-up behavior.一项针对父母和学生干预对青少年饮酒行为影响的整群随机试验,在基线 4 年后没有发现追赶行为的证据。
Addict Behav. 2013 Apr;38(4):2032-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
5
Secondary Effects of an Alcohol Prevention Program Targeting Students and/or Parents.针对学生和/或家长的酒精预防计划的次要效果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Aug;67:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously.预防青少年重度饮酒(PAS):对分别和同时提供给家长和学生的干预措施进行的群组随机试验。
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1669-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02677.x.
7
Risk moderation of a parent and student preventive alcohol intervention by adolescent and family factors: a cluster randomized trial.青少年和家庭因素对父母和学生预防酒精干预的风险调节:一项聚类随机试验。
Prev Med. 2014 Mar;60:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.027. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
8
Alcohol-specific parenting, adolescents' self-control, and alcohol use: a moderated mediation model.特定于酒精的父母教养方式、青少年的自我控制能力与饮酒行为:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Jan;75(1):16-23. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.16.
9
A parent-oriented alcohol prevention program "Effekt" had no impact on adolescents' alcohol use: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Estonia.一项以家长为导向的预防酒精滥用项目“Effekt”对青少年饮酒行为没有影响:来自爱沙尼亚一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Differential impact of a Dutch alcohol prevention program targeting adolescents and parents separately and simultaneously: low self-control and lenient parenting at baseline predict effectiveness.针对青少年及其父母分别和同时开展的荷兰酒精预防项目的差异影响:基线时的低自我控制和宽松养育方式预测了项目的有效性。
Prev Sci. 2012 Jun;13(3):278-87. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0267-9.

引用本文的文献

1
24-month outcomes of an eHealth universal program for students and parents to prevent adolescent alcohol use: A cluster randomized controlled trial in schools.一项针对学生和家长预防青少年饮酒的电子健康通用计划的24个月成果:一项学校集群随机对照试验
Internet Interv. 2023 Jul 13;33:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100648. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
A Qualitative Study on Children's Digital Media Use and Parents' Self-interest.关于儿童数字媒体使用与家长自身利益的定性研究
J Child Fam Stud. 2022;31(7):2015-2026. doi: 10.1007/s10826-021-02074-3. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Improved inference in mediation analysis: Introducing the model-based constrained optimization procedure.
中介分析中的改进推断:引入基于模型的约束优化过程。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Aug;25(4):496-515. doi: 10.1037/met0000259. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation.序贯中介模型中的间接效应:检验假设检验和置信区间形成方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Mar-Apr;55(2):188-210. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1618545. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.针对年轻人饮酒问题的家庭预防计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 19;3(3):CD012287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012287.pub2.
6
Climate schools plus: An online, combined student and parent, universal drug prevention program.气候学校升级版:一项面向学生和家长的在线通用药物预防联合项目。
Internet Interv. 2018 Mar 24;12:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.007. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Internet-Based Universal Prevention for Students and Parents to Prevent Alcohol and Cannabis Use Among Adolescents: Protocol for the Randomized Controlled Trial of Climate Schools Plus.基于互联网的面向学生和家长的预防青少年酒精和大麻使用的通用预防措施:气候学校升级版随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Aug 17;7(8):e10849. doi: 10.2196/10849.
8
How Do Family-Focused Prevention Programs Work? A Review of Mediating Mechanisms Associated with Reductions in Youth Antisocial Behaviors.以家庭为中心的预防项目如何发挥作用?与青少年反社会行为减少相关的中介机制综述。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;19(4):285-309. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0207-0.
9
The Outcomes of an Alcohol Prevention Program on Parents' Rule Setting and Self-efficacy: a Bidirectional Model.一项关于父母规则设定和自我效能的酒精预防计划的结果:一个双向模型。
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0625-0.