Suppr超能文献

复杂任务绩效评估的信度与效度:一种基于表现的执行功能评估

The reliability and validity of the Complex Task Performance Assessment: A performance-based assessment of executive function.

作者信息

Wolf Timothy J, Dahl Abigail, Auen Colleen, Doherty Meghan

机构信息

a Program in Occupational Therapy , Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine , St. Louis , USA.

b Department of Neurology , Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine , St. Louis , USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jul;27(5):707-721. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1037771. Epub 2015 May 5.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity of the Complex Task Performance Assessment (CTPA): an ecologically valid performance-based assessment of executive function. Community control participants (n = 20) and individuals with mild stroke (n = 14) participated in this study. All participants completed the CTPA and a battery of cognitive assessments at initial testing. The control participants completed the CTPA at two different times one week apart. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability for the total score on the CTPA was .991. The ICCs for all of the sub-scores of the CTPA were also high (.889-.977). The CTPA total score was significantly correlated to Condition 4 of the DKEFS Color-Word Interference Test (p = -.425), and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (p  = -.493). Finally, there were significant differences between control subjects and individuals with mild stroke on the total score of the CTPA (p = .007) and all sub-scores except interpretation failures and total items incorrect. These results are also consistent with other current executive function performance-based assessments and indicate that the CTPA is a reliable and valid performance-based measure of executive function.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估复杂任务绩效评估(CTPA)的评分者间信度、重测信度、同时效度和区分效度:这是一种基于生态效度的执行功能绩效评估。社区对照参与者(n = 20)和轻度中风患者(n = 14)参与了本研究。所有参与者在初次测试时完成了CTPA和一系列认知评估。对照参与者在相隔一周的两个不同时间完成了CTPA。CTPA总分的评分者间信度的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.991。CTPA所有子分数的ICC也很高(0.889 - 0.977)。CTPA总分与DKEFS颜色-文字干扰测试的条件4(p = -0.425)和韦氏成人阅读测验(p = -0.493)显著相关。最后,对照受试者与轻度中风患者在CTPA总分(p = 0.007)以及除解释错误和总错误项目外的所有子分数上存在显著差异。这些结果也与其他当前基于执行功能绩效的评估一致,并表明CTPA是一种可靠且有效的基于绩效的执行功能测量方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Metrics in Cancer Rehabilitation.癌症康复中的结局指标与患者报告指标
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Aug;25(8):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01412-6. Epub 2023 May 6.
5
Inconsistent Classification of Mild Stroke and Implications on Health Services Delivery.轻度中风分类不一致对医疗服务提供的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1243-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive dysfunction immediately after mild stroke.轻度中风后即刻出现的执行功能障碍
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2011 Winter;31(1):S23-9. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20101108-05.
7
Returning to work after stroke: a review.中风后重返工作岗位:综述
Int J Rehabil Res. 2009 Jun;32(2):93-7. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328325a358.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验