Chang Wen-Yu, Huang Adam, Chen Yin-Chun, Lin Chi-Wei, Tsai John, Yang Chung-Kai, Huang Yin-Tseng, Wu Yi-Fan, Chen Gwo-Shing
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Dermatology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Research Center for Adaptive Data Analysis, Center for Biomarkers and Translational Medicine, and Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan.
BMJ Open. 2015 May 3;5(4):e007823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007823.
To investigate the feasibility of manual segmentation by users of different backgrounds in a previously developed multifeature computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system to classify melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions based on conventional digital photographic images.
In total, 347 conventional photographs of melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions were retrospectively reviewed, and manually segmented by two groups of physicians, dermatologists and general practitioners, as well as by an automated segmentation software program, JSEG. The performance of CADx based on inputs from these two groups of physicians and that of the JSEG program was compared using feature agreement analysis.
The estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for classification of benign or malignant skin lesions based were comparable on individual segmentation by the gold standard (0.893, 95% CI 0.856 to 0.930), dermatologists (0.886, 95% CI 0.863 to 0.908), general practitioners (0.883, 95% CI 0.864 to 0.903) and JSEG (0.856, 95% CI 0.812 to 0.899). The agreement in the malignancy probability scores among the physicians was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.91). By selecting an optimal cut-off value of malignancy probability score, the sensitivity and specificity were 80.07% and 81.47% for dermatologists and 79.90% and 80.20% for general practitioners.
This study suggests that manual segmentation by general practitioners is feasible in the described CADx system for classifying benign and malignant skin lesions.
探讨在先前开发的多特征计算机辅助诊断(CADx)系统中,不同背景的使用者对基于传统数码照片的黑素细胞性和非黑素细胞性皮肤病变进行手动分割的可行性。
回顾性分析了347张黑素细胞性和非黑素细胞性皮肤病变的传统照片,并由皮肤科医生和全科医生两组医生以及自动分割软件程序JSEG进行手动分割。使用特征一致性分析比较了基于这两组医生输入的CADx性能与JSEG程序的性能。
基于金标准个体分割(0.893,95%可信区间0.856至0.930)、皮肤科医生(0.886,95%可信区间0.863至0.908)、全科医生(0.883,95%可信区间0.864至0.903)和JSEG(0.856,95%可信区间0.812至0.899)对良性或恶性皮肤病变分类的受试者操作特征曲线下估计面积具有可比性。医生之间恶性概率评分的一致性极佳(组内相关系数:0.91)。通过选择恶性概率评分的最佳截断值,皮肤科医生的敏感性和特异性分别为80.07%和81.47%,全科医生为79.90%和80.20%。
本研究表明,在所述的CADx系统中,全科医生进行手动分割对良性和恶性皮肤病变进行分类是可行的。