Suppr超能文献

剪切波超声弹性成像与肌肉硬度计测定颈部和肩部僵硬程度的比较

Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter.

作者信息

Akagi Ryota, Kusama Saki

机构信息

College of Systems Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Saitama-shi, Saitama, Japan.

College of Systems Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Saitama-shi, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Aug;41(8):2266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 2.

Abstract

The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four young men and women participated in the study. Their neck and shoulder stiffness was determined at six sites. Before the start of the measurements, patients rated their present subjective symptoms of neck and shoulder stiffness on a 6-point verbal scale. At all measurement sites, the correlation coefficients between the values of muscle hardness indices determined by the muscle hardness meter and shear wave ultrasound elastography were not significant. Furthermore, individuals' subjective neck and shoulder stiffness did not correspond to their objective symptoms. These results suggest that the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography is essential to more precisely assess neck and shoulder stiffness.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较通过剪切波超声弹性成像测定的颈部和肩部僵硬值与使用肌肉硬度计获得的值,并验证颈部和肩部客观僵硬与主观僵硬之间的对应关系。24名年轻男性和女性参与了该研究。在六个部位测定了他们的颈部和肩部僵硬程度。在测量开始前,患者用6分语言量表对其当前颈部和肩部僵硬的主观症状进行评分。在所有测量部位,肌肉硬度计和剪切波超声弹性成像测定的肌肉硬度指数值之间的相关系数不显著。此外,个体的颈部和肩部主观僵硬与他们的客观症状不相符。这些结果表明,使用剪切波超声弹性成像对于更精确地评估颈部和肩部僵硬至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验