Suppr超能文献

热性惊厥:急诊医学视角

Febrile seizures: emergency medicine perspective.

作者信息

Kimia Amir A, Bachur Richard G, Torres Alcy, Harper Marvin B

机构信息

aDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital bPediatric Neurology, Boston Medical Center cDivision of Emergency Medicine, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015 Jun;27(3):292-7. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000220.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review describes current evidence on the evaluation of febrile seizures in the acute setting, the need for further outpatient assessment, and predictors regarding long-term outcomes of these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

New evidence has been added in support of limited assessment and intervention: evidence on low utility of lumbar puncture, emergent neuroimaging, and follow-up electroencephalography, as well as low yield for antipyretic prophylaxis and intermittent use of antiepileptic drugs. Finally, there is growing evidence regarding the genetic basis of both febrile seizures and vaccine-related seizures/febrile seizures.

SUMMARY

Routine diagnostic testing for simple febrile seizures is being discouraged, and clear evidence-based guidelines regarding complex febrile seizures are lacking. Thus, clinical acumen remains the most important tool for identifying children with seizures who are candidates for a more elaborate diagnostic evaluation. Similarly, evidence and guidelines regarding candidates for an emergent out-of-hospital diazepam treatment are lacking.

摘要

综述目的

本综述阐述了当前关于急性发热性惊厥评估、进一步门诊评估需求以及这些患者长期预后预测因素的证据。

最新发现

已有新证据支持有限的评估和干预:腰椎穿刺、急诊神经影像学检查及随访脑电图效用低的证据,以及退热预防和间歇性使用抗癫痫药物收益低的证据。最后,关于发热性惊厥和疫苗相关惊厥/发热性惊厥的遗传基础,证据越来越多。

总结

不鼓励对单纯性发热性惊厥进行常规诊断检测,且缺乏关于复杂性发热性惊厥的明确循证指南。因此,临床敏锐度仍是识别需要更详细诊断评估的惊厥患儿最重要的工具。同样,缺乏关于院外紧急使用地西泮治疗候选者的证据和指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验