O'Connor Laura, Imamura Fumiaki, Lentjes Marleen A H, Khaw Kay-Tee, Wareham Nicholas J, Forouhi Nita G
Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, PO Box 285, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK,
Diabetologia. 2015 Jul;58(7):1474-83. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3572-1. Epub 2015 May 6.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the association of types of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages, sweetened tea/coffee), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) and fruit juice with incident type 2 diabetes and determine the effects of substituting non-SSB for SSB and the population-attributable fraction of type 2 diabetes due to total sweet beverages.
Beverage consumption of 25,639 UK-resident adults without diabetes at baseline (1993-1997) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study was assessed using 7-day food diaries. During 10.8 years of follow-up 847 incident type 2 diabetes cases were verified.
In adjusted Cox regression analyses there were positive associations (HR [95% CI] per serving/day]) for soft drinks 1.21 (1.05, 1.39), sweetened-milk beverages 1.22 (1.05, 1.43) and ASB 1.22 (1.11, 1.33), but not for sweetened tea/coffee 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) or fruit juice 1.01 (0.88, 1.15). Further adjustment for adiposity attenuated the association of ASB, HR 1.06 (0.93, 1.20). There was a positive dose-response relationship with total sweet beverages: HR per 5% energy 1.18 (1.11, 1.26). Substituting ASB for any SSB did not reduce the incidence in analyses accounting for energy intake and adiposity. Substituting one serving/day of water or unsweetened tea/coffee for soft drinks and for sweetened-milk beverages reduced the incidence by 14%-25%. If sweet beverage consumers reduced intake to below 2% energy, 15% of incident diabetes might be prevented.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The consumption of soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages and energy from total sweet beverages was associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk independently of adiposity. Water or unsweetened tea/coffee appear to be suitable alternatives to SSB for diabetes prevention. These findings support the implementation of population-based interventions to reduce SSB consumption and increase the consumption of suitable alternatives.
目的/假设:本研究旨在评估含糖饮料(SSB)(软饮料、甜牛奶饮料、甜茶/咖啡)、人工甜味饮料(ASB)和果汁与2型糖尿病发病之间的关联,并确定用非SSB替代SSB的效果以及所有甜味饮料导致2型糖尿病的人群归因分数。
在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)-诺福克研究中,使用7天食物日记评估了25639名基线时(1993 - 1997年)无糖尿病的英国成年居民的饮料消费情况。在10.8年的随访期间,确诊了847例2型糖尿病新发病例。
在调整后的Cox回归分析中,软饮料(每杯/天的风险比[95%置信区间])为1.21(1.05,1.39)、甜牛奶饮料为1.22(1.05,1.43)以及ASB为1.22(1.11,1.33)存在正相关,但甜茶/咖啡为0.98(0.94,1.02)或果汁为1.01(0.88,1.15)不存在正相关。进一步对肥胖进行调整后,ASB的相关性减弱,风险比为1.06(0.93,1.20)。与所有甜味饮料存在正剂量反应关系:每5%能量的风险比为1.18(1.11,1.26)。在考虑能量摄入和肥胖的分析中,用ASB替代任何SSB均未降低发病率。用每天一杯水或无糖茶/咖啡替代软饮料和甜牛奶饮料可使发病率降低14% - 25%。如果甜味饮料消费者将摄入量降至能量的2%以下,可能预防15%的糖尿病新发病例。
结论/解读:软饮料、甜牛奶饮料的消费以及所有甜味饮料中的能量与2型糖尿病风险升高相关,且独立于肥胖因素。水或无糖茶/咖啡似乎是预防糖尿病的SSB合适替代品。这些发现支持实施基于人群的干预措施以减少SSB消费并增加合适替代品的消费。