Mueller Anna Katharina, Tucha Lara, Koerts Janneke, Groen Yvonne, Lange Klaus W, Tucha Oliver
Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 5;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2049-9256-2-5. eCollection 2014.
Since the elimination of items associated with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) during the transition from DSM-III to DSM-IV from the diagnostic criteria of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), interest in SCT and its associated cognitive as well as emotional and social consequences is on the increase. The current review discusses recent findings on SCT in clinical as well as community based ADHD populations. The focus is further on clinical correlates of SCT in populations different from ADHD, SCT's genetic background, SCT's association with internalizing and other behavioral comorbidities, as well as SCT's association with social functioning and its treatment efficacy.
A systematic review of empirical studies on SCT in ADHD and other pathologies in PsycInfo, SocIndex, Web of Science and PubMed using the key terms "Sluggish Cognitive Tempo", "Cognitive Tempo", "Sluggish Tempo" was performed. Thirty-two out of 63 studies met inclusion criteria and are discussed in the current review.
RESULTS/CONCLUSION: From the current literature, it can be concluded that SCT is a psychometrically valid construct with additive value in the clinical field of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), internalizing disorders and neuro-rehabilitation. The taxonomy of SCT has been shown to be far from consistent across studies; however, the impact of SCT on individuals' functioning (e.g., academic achievement, social interactions) seems remarkable. SCT has been shown to share some of the genes with ADHD, however, related most strongly to non-shared environmental factors. Future research should focus on the identification of adequate SCT measurement to promote symptom tailored treatment and increase studies on SCT in populations different from ADHD.
自注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断标准从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)过渡到第四版(DSM - IV)期间,与认知迟缓节奏(SCT)相关的条目被剔除后,对SCT及其相关的认知、情感和社会后果的关注度不断增加。本综述讨论了在临床以及基于社区的ADHD人群中关于SCT的最新研究结果。重点进一步放在与ADHD不同人群中SCT的临床相关性、SCT的遗传背景、SCT与内化及其他行为共病的关联,以及SCT与社会功能及其治疗效果的关联上。
在PsycInfo、SocIndex、科学引文索引(Web of Science)和PubMed中,使用关键词“认知迟缓节奏”“认知节奏”“迟缓节奏”对关于ADHD和其他病症中SCT的实证研究进行了系统综述。63项研究中有32项符合纳入标准,并在本综述中进行了讨论。
结果/结论:从当前文献可以得出结论,SCT是一个在心理测量学上有效的结构,在ADHD、对立违抗障碍(ODD)、内化障碍和神经康复的临床领域具有附加价值。研究表明,SCT的分类在不同研究中远不一致;然而,SCT对个体功能(如学业成绩、社交互动)的影响似乎很显著。研究表明,SCT与ADHD共享一些基因,但与非共享环境因素的关联最为强烈。未来的研究应侧重于确定适当的SCT测量方法,以促进针对症状的治疗,并增加对与ADHD不同人群中SCT的研究。