Rudasingwa Martin, Soeters Robert, Bossuyt Michel
Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Oct 29;7(3):15-29. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p15.
To strengthen the health care delivery, the Burundian Government in collaboration with international NGOs piloted performance-based financing (PBF) in 2006. The health facilities were assigned - by using a simple matching method - to begin PBF scheme or to continue with the traditional input-based funding. Our objective was to analyse the effect of that PBF scheme on the quality of health services between 2006 and 2008. We conducted the analysis in 16 health facilities with PBF scheme and 13 health facilities without PBF scheme. We analysed the PBF effect by using 58 composite quality indicators of eight health services: Care management, outpatient care, maternity care, prenatal care, family planning, laboratory services, medicines management and materials management. The differences in quality improvement in the two groups of health facilities were performed applying descriptive statistics, a paired non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and a simple difference-in-difference approach at a significance level of 5%. We found an improvement of the quality of care in the PBF group and a significant deterioration in the non-PBF group in the same four health services: care management, outpatient care, maternity care, and prenatal care. The findings suggest a PBF effect of between 38 and 66 percentage points (p<0.001) in the quality scores of care management, outpatient care, prenatal care, and maternal care. We found no PBF effect on clinical support services: laboratory services, medicines management, and material management. The PBF scheme in Burundi contributed to the improvement of the health services that were strongly under the control of medical personnel (physicians and nurses) in a short time of two years. The clinical support services that did not significantly improved were strongly under the control of laboratory technicians, pharmacists and non-medical personnel.
为加强医疗服务提供,布隆迪政府与国际非政府组织合作,于2006年试行基于绩效的融资(PBF)。通过一种简单的匹配方法,为各医疗机构分配任务,以启动PBF计划或继续采用传统的基于投入的资金模式。我们的目标是分析2006年至2008年期间该PBF计划对医疗服务质量的影响。我们在16个实施PBF计划的医疗机构和13个未实施PBF计划的医疗机构进行了分析。我们使用八项医疗服务的58个综合质量指标来分析PBF的效果:护理管理、门诊护理、孕产妇护理、产前护理、计划生育、实验室服务、药品管理和物资管理。运用描述性统计、配对非参数威尔科克森符号秩检验和简单的差分法,在5%的显著性水平上对两组医疗机构的质量改善差异进行了分析。我们发现,在护理管理、门诊护理、孕产妇护理和产前护理这四项相同的医疗服务中,PBF组的护理质量有所提高,而非PBF组则显著恶化。研究结果表明,在护理管理、门诊护理、产前护理和孕产妇护理的质量得分方面,PBF的效果在38至66个百分点之间(p<0.001)。我们发现PBF对临床支持服务(实验室服务、药品管理和物资管理)没有影响。布隆迪的PBF计划在短短两年时间内,有助于改善在医务人员(医生和护士)严格控制下的医疗服务。未显著改善的临床支持服务则主要由实验室技术人员、药剂师和非医务人员控制。