Rudasingwa Martin, Soeters Robert, Basenya Olivier
a Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine , University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany.
b Sina Health , Den Haag , The Netherlands.
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1327241. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1327241.
Several developing countries, especially in Africa, have implemented performance-based financing (PBF) schemes with the aim of improving healthcare provision. PBF was first implemented in Burundi in 2006 as a pilot programme in three provinces and was rolled out nationwide in 2010.
To enrich existing studies on Burundi in three ways. Firstly, by evaluating the effect of PBF on maternal care at primary and hospital levels; secondly, on the possession of maternity logbooks for maternal care records; and thirdly, how the amount of subsidies influences healthcare outputs.
We used data from repeated cross-sectional surveys in 500 households (intervention group: 225; control group: 275) conducted in 2006 and 2008. A total of 274 women, aged 15-49, who had recently given birth, were interviewed about the use of maternal healthcare and the possession of maternity logbooks. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis using pooled cross-sectional survey data from 2006 and 2008.
We found that PBF is associated with an increased institutional deliveries probability of 39.5 percentage points (p < 0.01) - a relative improvement of 81.8%. Institutional deliveries probability increased significantly only at health centre level by 33.6 percentage points (p < 0.01), a relative rise of 80.6%. There is an indication of a positive spillover effect of PBF on the possession of maternity logbooks. We found no PBF effect on the number of antenatal care visits and anti-tetanus immunization.
Our findings suggest that institutional delivery highly improved because it came from a low baseline and its unit payment was relatively high, leading health workers to promote its use. The fact that deliveries mainly increased in health centres and not in hospitals may be explained by the context of how health delivery is organized in Burundi. Health policymakers have to determine the appropriate financial incentives that best influence the improvement of each health service.
几个发展中国家,尤其是非洲国家,已实施基于绩效的融资(PBF)计划,旨在改善医疗服务提供情况。PBF于2006年在布隆迪作为一项在三个省份开展的试点计划首次实施,并于2010年推广至全国。
通过三种方式丰富现有的关于布隆迪的研究。首先,评估PBF对基层和医院层面孕产妇护理的影响;其次,评估孕产妇护理记录所用孕产妇日志的持有情况;第三,评估补贴金额如何影响医疗产出。
我们使用了2006年和2008年对500户家庭(干预组:225户;对照组:275户)进行的重复横断面调查数据。共采访了274名年龄在15 - 49岁之间、近期分娩的妇女,了解她们对孕产妇保健的使用情况以及孕产妇日志的持有情况。我们使用2006年和2008年的汇总横断面调查数据进行了双重差分分析。
我们发现,PBF与机构分娩概率增加39.5个百分点相关(p < 0.01)——相对提高了81.8%。机构分娩概率仅在卫生中心层面显著增加了33.6个百分点(p < 0.01),相对上升了80.6%。有迹象表明PBF对孕产妇日志的持有产生了积极的溢出效应。我们未发现PBF对产前检查次数和破伤风免疫接种有影响。
我们的研究结果表明,机构分娩率大幅提高是因为其起始基线较低且单位支付相对较高,这促使卫生工作者推广其使用。分娩主要在卫生中心而非医院增加这一事实,可能由布隆迪医疗服务的组织情况来解释。卫生政策制定者必须确定最能影响各项医疗服务改善的适当财政激励措施。