Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239036. eCollection 2020.
Malnutrition is a huge problem in Burundi. In order to improve the health system response, the Ministry of Health piloted the introduction of malnutrition prevention and care indicators within its performance-based financing (PBF) scheme. Paying for units of services and for qualitative indicators is expected to enhance provision and quality of these nutrition services. The objective of this study is to assess the impacts of this intervention, on both child acute malnutrition recovery rates at health centre level and prevalence of chronic and acute malnutrition among children at community level. This study follows a cluster-randomized controlled evaluation design: 90 health centres (HC) were randomly selected for the study, 45 of them were randomly assigned to the intervention and received payment related to their performance in malnutrition activities, while the other 45 constituted the control group and got a simple budget allocation. Data were collected from baseline and follow-up surveys of the 90 health centres and 6,480 households with children aged 6 to 23 months. From the respectively 1,067 and 1,402 moderate and severe acute malnutrition transcribed files and registers, findings suggest that the intervention had a positive impact on moderate acute malnutrition recovery rates (OR: 5.59, p = 0.039 -at the endline, 78% in the control group and 97% in the intervention group) but not on uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition recovery rate (OR: 1.16, p = 0.751 -at the endline, 93% in the control group and 92% in the intervention group). The intervention also had a significant increasing impact on the number of children treated for acute malnutrition. Analyses from the anthropometric data collected among 12,679 children aged 6-23 months suggest improvements at health centre level did not translate into better results at community level: prevalence of both acute and chronic malnutrition remained high, precisely at the endline, acute and chronic malnutrition prevalence were resp. 8.80% and 49.90% in the control group and 8.70% and 52.0% in the intervention group, the differences being non-significant. PBF can contribute to a better management of malnutrition at HC level; yet, to address the huge problem of child malnutrition in Burundi, additional strategies are urgently required.
营养不良是布隆迪的一个大问题。为了改善卫生系统的应对措施,卫生部在绩效为基础的融资(PBF)计划中试点引入了预防和治疗营养不良的指标。为服务单位和质量指标付费有望提高这些营养服务的提供和质量。本研究的目的是评估这一干预措施对卫生中心一级儿童急性营养不良恢复率以及社区一级儿童慢性和急性营养不良流行率的影响。本研究采用了集群随机对照评估设计:随机选择了 90 个卫生中心(HC)进行研究,其中 45 个被随机分配到干预组,根据其在营养活动中的表现获得报酬,而其他 45 个则构成对照组,获得简单的预算分配。数据来自 90 个卫生中心和 6480 个有 6 至 23 个月大儿童的家庭的基线和随访调查。从分别为 1067 名和 1402 名中重度急性营养不良转录文件和登记册中发现,干预措施对中重度急性营养不良恢复率有积极影响(OR:5.59,p=0.039-在最后期限时,对照组为 78%,干预组为 97%),但对无并发症的严重急性营养不良恢复率没有影响(OR:1.16,p=0.751-在最后期限时,对照组为 93%,干预组为 92%)。该干预措施还对接受急性营养不良治疗的儿童人数产生了显著的增长影响。对 12679 名 6-23 个月大的儿童进行的人体测量数据分析表明,卫生中心一级的改善并没有转化为社区一级的更好结果:急性和慢性营养不良的流行率仍然很高,确切地说,在最后期限时,对照组的急性和慢性营养不良流行率分别为 8.80%和 49.90%,干预组分别为 8.70%和 52.0%,差异不显著。PBF 可以有助于改善卫生中心一级的营养不良管理;然而,为了解决布隆迪儿童营养不良的巨大问题,迫切需要采取额外的策略。